Skip to main content

401k payment method

Image
By scooby
Did LLNL do something weird with the 401K payment methods?

I heard a letter was sent out.

Comments

Andrew Heckinger said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
7/10/2013 9:30 PM
Andrew Heckinger said…
Yes, I received a letter from the CFO June 24, 2013 about ineligible employee deductions "due to the incorrect classification of pay codes". Upon further investigation I was told by Linda Thorn from the Financial Services Help Desk that contributions made to the 401k that came from overtime were mistakenly allowed to be put in. As a former employee having had chosen the TCP2 option, the ramifications could be huge, possibly having to redo taxes from 2007-2012. July 15th is when I will find out the damage. It sounds like I will get a heavily taxed check of some sort and a much lower 401k balance. I"ll give an update when all is said and done.
7/10/2013 9:34 PM
Anonymous said…
I doubt you'd have to redo taxes. Any "refund" they give you in 2013 should count as income in 2013. You report in the year you receive it.
7/15/2013 11:14 AM
Anonymous said…
Is this another mess made by Rosenketor?
7/23/2013 8:06 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

By scooby
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
155 comments
Read more

Trump is to gut the labs.

By scooby
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.
124 comments
Read more

Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem

By scooby
From the Huffington Post Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/25/work-words_n_5159868.html?utm_hp_ref=business&ir=Business When we replace a specific task with a vague expression, we grant the task more magnitude than it deserves. If we don't describe an activity plainly, it seems less like an easily achievable goal and more like a cloudy state of existence that fills unknowable amounts of time. A fog of fast and empty language has seeped into the workplace. I say it's time we air it out, making room for simple, concrete words, and, therefore, more deliberate actions. By striking the following 26 words from your speech, I think you'll find that you're not quite as overwhelmed as you thought you were. Count the number that LLNLs mangers use.  touch base circle back bandwidth - impactful - utilize - table the discussion deep dive - engagement - viral value-add - one-sheet deliverable - work product - incentivise - take it to the ...
96 comments
Read more