Skip to main content

The Photo Behind the Blog Title:

Image
By scooby
The Photo Behind the Blog Title:

I just realized this. The photo used behind the title for this blog looks like a tombstone, since the date says "1952-2007". Was this photo doctored and made to look like a "tombstone"? I only realized the irony just now (yes maybe I'm slow). The anger against Bechtel and the state of the lab (versus many decades ago) seem to reflect this idea.

Comments

Anonymous said…
You are a noob for not realizing that
7/18/2013 10:42 PM
Anonymous said…
I keep hearing about how Bechtel wrecked LLNL but I beg to differ. Bechtel and the other partners came in to manage a distressed organization. On top of that the lab would have been on about the same condition it is now even if Bechtel was not onboard. The lab does as it wants. It tells Bechtel what to do and not the other way around.
7/19/2013 2:12 AM
Anonymous said…
None of the national labs should be managed by private industry.
7/19/2013 2:20 AM
Anonymous said…
The consortiums don't have a great track record unfortunately. Maybe if it was a single large private sector corporation as the managing agency then the parent company might take a more active role in ensuring success. An LLC as agent is a mistake since liability (and therefore accountability) does not extend to Bechtel.
7/19/2013 2:31 AM
Anonymous said…
First you have to have a mission and so far you've failed to deliver on clean alternative energy each time given a chance and then think you can fall back on weapons to save you. Those days are gone and should be forever. Now we need more support for NSA and global security. Then we need to have the Mossad find Edward Snowden and do what they do best using him as an example to what will be done to anyone who choses to do the same. Our tax dollars need to go wher they'll do us the best good
7/19/2013 6:22 AM
Anonymous said…
Detractor: "Mission? What is your mission?"

Lab: "We don't need no stinkin mission."
7/19/2013 8:27 AM
Anonymous said…
July 19, 2013 at 2:20 AM is right. The consortium LLC model has to be thrown out completely.
7/19/2013 8:49 AM
Anonymous said…
The tombstone and the current zombie craze are apropo symbols for the labs - those employed there are now the walking dead.
7/19/2013 10:13 AM
Anonymous said…
NIF still has a small chance of paying off, no?
7/19/2013 12:33 PM
Anonymous said…
As far as the tombstone - the REAL death year was 1992 when underground testing stopped...
7/19/2013 2:33 PM
Anonymous said…
I have to react to the second posting which is nothing short of ignorant. "Bechtel and other partners came to manage a distressed organization". What a bunch of blarney. What type of fiction are you writing. LLNL was just fine. LBL avoided this disaster and they avoided what we got. A contract with fees, state taxes, and bloated promises of some sort of cost savings because of the expertise of the likes of Becthel. Those items alone cost us 500 employees immediately, and another 500 later. None of the promises were met, and we got about 50 senior imports that have done just what? I challenge you to back your phoney claim up. What did Becthel and the partner bring to the Lab? Incredible claim. Do we have new business? Are we growing? Do we have rock solid pensions? Do we get regular raises? Is our real salary growing? Do we have fusion? OK that one is not Bechtel's fault, that is the rat pack. I am not saying we did not have management issues before, but it sure as hell is worse by any measure. The consortium idea is NNSA's biggest failure in judgement. Bechtel simply responded and took the money, but NNSA gave them an opporutnity to get a lot from doing nothing. Travisty, travisty
7/30/2013 2:18 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

By scooby
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
155 comments
Read more

Trump is to gut the labs.

By scooby
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.
124 comments
Read more

LLNL un-diversity

By scooby
Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!
79 comments
Read more