I think at the time the loyalty oath was called, "a revised code of ethics". Moral relativism aside, I refused to sign it and was told that Nanos was taking names and if I valued my job I should get on board with the former Vice Admiral and his fictional agenda for the Good Ship Lollipop.
11 comments:
LLNL makes you sign loyalty agreements, but we cannot make them sign one to us.
Really, they make you sign a loyalty agreement? Or is this sarcasm?
Assume that everything you read on this blog is anti-lab BS, and you'll be right 95% of the time.
This is one of those times.
5:47 isn't a Lab employee or he would know that we were told to sign a loyalty agreement in 2005.
OK, I'll bite. How about some more details, or a link to it?
I think at the time the loyalty oath was called, "a revised code of ethics". Moral relativism aside, I refused to sign it and was told that Nanos was taking names and if I valued my job I should get on board with the former Vice Admiral and his fictional agenda for the Good Ship Lollipop.
As I thought. Not a "loyalty agreement" by any normal definition.
Did you read it? I did, asshole.
That's nice.
Still not a loyalty agreement, as you originally asserted.
Liar.
So that wasn't llnl, it was LANL, if it was Nanos. That aside, post the "oath".
So back to the 3rd post in this thread:
Assume that everything you read on this blog is anti-lab BS, and you'll be right 95% of the time.
This is one of those times.
Post a Comment