From the Huffington Post Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/25/work-words_n_5159868.html?utm_hp_ref=business&ir=Business When we replace a specific task with a vague expression, we grant the task more magnitude than it deserves. If we don't describe an activity plainly, it seems less like an easily achievable goal and more like a cloudy state of existence that fills unknowable amounts of time. A fog of fast and empty language has seeped into the workplace. I say it's time we air it out, making room for simple, concrete words, and, therefore, more deliberate actions. By striking the following 26 words from your speech, I think you'll find that you're not quite as overwhelmed as you thought you were. Count the number that LLNLs mangers use. touch base circle back bandwidth - impactful - utilize - table the discussion deep dive - engagement - viral value-add - one-sheet deliverable - work product - incentivise - take it to the ...
Comments
Hear hear, that will certainly solve NIF's problem. But I guess what you really want is NIF to never reach fusion, so do not fund it.
Ten shots a second on NIF is a wet dream. What NIF is, is just another toy to keep the well to do employed and a toy for weapons research which noone cares about and is not needed. We all know they work when need be and they all will be fine just as long as you keep up the maintenance or build replacements. The five billion + dollars should have been spend on building wind turbines. We'd have been far ahead and actually gotten something useful for our tax dollars.
Ten shots a second on NIF is a wet dream. What NIF is, is just another toy to keep the well to do employed and a toy for weapons research which noone cares about and is not needed. We all know they work when need be and they all will be fine just as long as you keep up the maintenance or build replacements. The five billion + dollars should have been spend on building wind turbines. We'd have been far ahead and actually gotten something useful for our tax dollars.
"We all know they work when need be and they all will be fine just as long as you keep up the maintenance or build replacements."
Just remember Maxwell at the turn of the century, who claimed all discoveries in physics have been done.
Also I fail to see the connection between your ten shots claim and the August 28, 2013 at 5:48 PM post.
But I guess you just mix and match your arguments in any way to make a point.
Great scientific mind
Not going to happen, ever !
When is the next version of NIF with the 512 arms going to be announced. It's a corporate contractors wet dream. I'm sure that's what the review will decide is needed to get this thing to actually work. MOX and NIF ... let the good times roll and the huge Yachts sail!
Totally agree!!! NIF is an excuse to entertain physicists. Employ them doing useful research to help us address today's energy and climate crises.
Without taking a position one way or the other on NIF, that is pretty stupid. "No more money for you until you accomplish what we were giving you money to do." What are they supposed to do--have a bake sale to keep going? Car washes? Not to mention that, again, whether one thinks it a good idea or not, they do have a mission that's not about fusion per se.
The mission of EOS does not have to be done. The weapons work and as any good mechanic knows. If it isn't broke, don't fix it. You guys are just sucking the tax payer dry for all they have to assure you still have a job. There's your per se mission bubby.
If anyone dares to looks inside the black box at the burning cash, it disturbs the experiment due to "Schroedinger's Cat" quantum phenomena and the fusion will not be seen. Therefore, peer review is not necessary and non-NIF scientists should just shut-up and see to it that more loads of cash are constantly shoveled in to the NIF facility to keep the NIF employees protected, fat & happy.
What we do without NIF keeping our stockpile safe, secure, and reliable".
HO HUM