Skip to main content

Lockheed Martin joins others to run NNSA sites

Lockheed Martin joins others to run NNSA sites .. The contract that consolidates the NNSA facilities could portend the fate of the Sandia National Laboratories’ contract. The NNSA, in a cost-cutting move, consolidated Y-12 and Pantex. .. “NNSA is moving toward a smaller and less expensive enterprise,” the agency said in the RFI. .. http://www.bizjournals.com/albuquerque/news/2013/11/04/lockheed-joins-others-to-run-NNSA-sites.html ------------------------- Guess who will be combined next? LLNL & LANL. Knapp is the vanguard for this move. November 5, 2013 at 8:48 AM

Comments

Anonymous said…
No big deal. Just get it done. Move all operations and its people to NM and all will be well for Livermore residence.
Anonymous said…
Sandia in Livermore needs to be shut down
Anonymous said…
What an amazing coincidence that all of the board members who sit on the board for LLNS (LLNL) are also the exact same board members who sit on the board for LANS (LANL). What are the odds?
Anonymous said…
What an amazing coincidence that all of the board members who sit on the board for LLNS (LLNL) are also the exact same board members who sit on the board for LANS (LANL). What are the odds?

They are one in the same and that's why someday you'll see the two labs become one even if that means they have to shut one down and move all to NM where they're in the middle of nowhere, safe and away from homes.
Anonymous said…
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What an amazing coincidence that all of the board members who sit on the board for LLNS (LLNL) are also the exact same board members who sit on the board for LANS (LANL). What are the odds?

November 5, 2013 at 10:00 PM


According to public UC documents, each board member is also paid many tens of thousands of dollars each year for each board. Some kind of double dipping for the members.
Anonymous said…


November 6, 2013 at 6:23 AM

Don't forget that the most recent congressional panel to look at the future of the NNSA labs has several of these same doubly compensated lab board members on it, one of them even as chairman of the panel. No way is that a conflict of interest.
Anonymous said…
If it's true (combining LLNL & LANL), it's the first smart thing I will have heard that NNSA is doing!
Anonymous said…
Combining is a generous word. A few people, physicists, would need to move. The rest need to get regular well compensating jobs in silicon valley, and I understand McDonalds is exploring whether or not the NIF facility could be used to flash-fry chicken McNuggets. This would put it to use for something. Win-win-win.
Anonymous said…
"I understand McDonalds is exploring whether or not the NIF facility could be used to flash-fry chicken McNuggets."

If we had a best post of the year award I'd vote for this one.
Anonymous said…
I understand McDonalds is exploring whether or not the NIF facility could be used to flash-fry chicken McNuggets.

November 6, 2013 at 11:25 AM

Yeah, but only one at a time and it takes two weeks to set up each shot.
Anonymous said…
...I can see Moses as Ronald McDonald....
Anonymous said…
...I can see Moses as Ronald McDonald....

November 7, 2013 at 5:25 PM

That image is wat too weird. Especially when it includes the tiny clown car running around under the lasers.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem

From the Huffington Post Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/25/work-words_n_5159868.html?utm_hp_ref=business&ir=Business When we replace a specific task with a vague expression, we grant the task more magnitude than it deserves. If we don't describe an activity plainly, it seems less like an easily achievable goal and more like a cloudy state of existence that fills unknowable amounts of time. A fog of fast and empty language has seeped into the workplace. I say it's time we air it out, making room for simple, concrete words, and, therefore, more deliberate actions. By striking the following 26 words from your speech, I think you'll find that you're not quite as overwhelmed as you thought you were. Count the number that LLNLs mangers use.  touch base circle back bandwidth - impactful - utilize - table the discussion deep dive - engagement - viral value-add - one-sheet deliverable - work product - incentivise - take it to the ...