Skip to main content

Nobody has a comment on the absence of "bonuses" this year?

Nobody has a comment on the absence of "bonuses" this year?

Comments

Anonymous said…
In most of the years since LLNS took over, all employees received a "non-base building" bonus. I think it was usually 1 to 1.5%.

This year, there was a single terse announcement that the Director decided that the "Variable Compensation Plan" was not being implemented this year. The announcement did not contain the word "bonus", so I wonder if people missed the implication.

Yes, I'm being greedy, since we DID get raises. But the employee bonuses were supposed to come out of the LLNS fee. The idea was that we deserved the bonus because we all helped earn the award fee.

I wonder where the fee money went.....
Anonymous said…
LANS has never done this.
Anonymous said…
Pretty sure there were only a couple years of bonuses, starting with the pay freeze. It seemed like a way to give the employees something.
Anonymous said…
Washington believes the NNSA labs are spoiled brats with way oversized salaries.
Anonymous said…
I didn't know that "Washington" believed in anything. Imagine that - a sentient city!
Anonymous said…
Sorry, if you want me to believe there's a sentient city, you'll have to pick a more credible choice than Washington.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!