Skip to main content

Top 3 candidates for the Engineering AD

Who are the top 3 candidates for the Engineering AD position?

Comments

Anonymous said…
Could you take Steve Girrens from LANL who is the AD for Engineering? This guy is useless at LANL.
Anonymous said…
You've always got Brett Knap.
Anonymous said…
Who cares? it's like changing captains after the Titanic hit the iceberg already.The lab is done. "Abandon ship!"
Anonymous said…
I vote for Joel Bowers
Anonymous said…
Joel Bowers yes!
Anonymous said…
Robert Ferencz! yes!
Anonymous said…
What is Monya accomplishing 9 months past her announced retirement date?
Anonymous said…
Bob Ferencz. Intelligent, competent, and a leader.
Anonymous said…
Anantha Krishnan.
Anonymous said…
Let Bob Ferencz know he needs to apply!
Anonymous said…
Heard in the halls: posting will be re-opened for a short time.

Time to get your favorite candidate to apply, if (s)he hasn't already.
Anonymous said…
You've always got Brett Knapp.

June 10, 2014 at 6:48 PM

Actually we hear Knapp is moving back to LANL.
Anonymous said…
Knapp is not welcome at LANL. Never was. Never will be.
Anonymous said…
Knapp is not welcome at LANL. Never was. Never will be.

June 15, 2014 at 2:56 PM

Could someone convey how Knapp (i.e. health) is doing? He looked emaciated during Goldstein's Director announcement.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

Rumor corner

LLNS may have excluded the wrong people in last VSSOP? The exclusions were based on outdated job categories and related skills. ULM are now thinking that in the future, job categories and functional areas will have to be re-defined. The next VSSOP/ISP will be based on the new categories and functional areas. The questions I have are: 1) Why didnt they think of that before the transition. It seems like their style is “change things as you go”. Planning is out the window! 2) Who will give input on the new changes? The next RIF apparently is going to be more lucrative than the VSSOP. Depending on the length of employment, a RIFed person, not only gets their 1 week pay per year of service but also from 30 to 120 days notice, essentially 30 to 120 days pay. Please feel free to comment on the rumors or add new ones you actually heard.