Skip to main content

Top 3 candidates for the Engineering AD

Who are the top 3 candidates for the Engineering AD position?

Comments

Anonymous said…
Could you take Steve Girrens from LANL who is the AD for Engineering? This guy is useless at LANL.
Anonymous said…
You've always got Brett Knap.
Anonymous said…
Who cares? it's like changing captains after the Titanic hit the iceberg already.The lab is done. "Abandon ship!"
Anonymous said…
I vote for Joel Bowers
Anonymous said…
Joel Bowers yes!
Anonymous said…
Robert Ferencz! yes!
Anonymous said…
What is Monya accomplishing 9 months past her announced retirement date?
Anonymous said…
Bob Ferencz. Intelligent, competent, and a leader.
Anonymous said…
Anantha Krishnan.
Anonymous said…
Let Bob Ferencz know he needs to apply!
Anonymous said…
Heard in the halls: posting will be re-opened for a short time.

Time to get your favorite candidate to apply, if (s)he hasn't already.
Anonymous said…
You've always got Brett Knapp.

June 10, 2014 at 6:48 PM

Actually we hear Knapp is moving back to LANL.
Anonymous said…
Knapp is not welcome at LANL. Never was. Never will be.
Anonymous said…
Knapp is not welcome at LANL. Never was. Never will be.

June 15, 2014 at 2:56 PM

Could someone convey how Knapp (i.e. health) is doing? He looked emaciated during Goldstein's Director announcement.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!