Skip to main content

Who are Scooby and Doobydew?

Have you ever wondered if Scooby and Doobydew are people you know? Who is behind them?

To find out,  visit the website on 1/1/16!

Merry Christmas!

Comments

Anonymous said…
I'm gonna guess they are working for either the Russians or the Chinese.
Anonymous said…
The suspense, the drama.
Anonymous said…
Who cares?
Anonymous said…
Inquiring minds would want to know.
Anonymous said…
Drum roll, please......
Anonymous said…
Why identify who they are now? Won't that just lead to attacks on their credibility here or at work if they are not retired? LANSLLNS is not a big fan of this blog you know. The bulk of the posts on this blog are anonymous. Don't they deserve the same privilege?
Anonymous said…
LANS/LLNS is not a big fan of this blog you know.

December 27, 2015 at 10:52 AM

Good! They can't handle the truth!!
Anonymous said…
Whoever they are, they deserve a lot of credit for providing a forum for LLNL/LANL employees to communicate in an open forum without fear of reprisal from LANS/LLNS Managers. Good job Scooby and Doobydew; have a great and successful New Year!
Anonymous said…
What are the chances that both Scooby and Doobydew are retiring at the same time?
Anonymous said…
if one and the same then, what.... around 95%?
Anonymous said…
I so enjoy the candidness of the blog and hope that by disclosing Scooby and Doobydew's identities that it won't change the flavor of this site.
Anonymous said…
Keep it like it is. Revealing their identities could be detrimental to their careers.
Anonymous said…
Why detrimental? They are doing nothing wrong. They are actually doing a service to llnl and lanl.
Anonymous said…


And? And?
Anonymous said…
They are doing nothing wrong. They are actually doing a service to llnl and lanl.

December 31, 2015 at 9:27 PM

You of course understand that not everyone agrees with your definition of "wrong."
Anonymous said…
Providing a service to the missions of LANS and LLNL, is not the same as providing a service to LANSLLNS. That is why they should remain anonymous.
Anonymous said…
Providing a service to the missions of LANL and LLNL, is not the same as providing a service to LANSLLNS. That is why they should remain anonymous. (typo)

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem

From the Huffington Post Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/25/work-words_n_5159868.html?utm_hp_ref=business&ir=Business When we replace a specific task with a vague expression, we grant the task more magnitude than it deserves. If we don't describe an activity plainly, it seems less like an easily achievable goal and more like a cloudy state of existence that fills unknowable amounts of time. A fog of fast and empty language has seeped into the workplace. I say it's time we air it out, making room for simple, concrete words, and, therefore, more deliberate actions. By striking the following 26 words from your speech, I think you'll find that you're not quite as overwhelmed as you thought you were. Count the number that LLNLs mangers use.  touch base circle back bandwidth - impactful - utilize - table the discussion deep dive - engagement - viral value-add - one-sheet deliverable - work product - incentivise - take it to the ...