Skip to main content

WHISTLEBLOWER CLAIMS $5 MILLION AGAINST NUCLEAR WEAPONS LAB


 WHISTLEBLOWER CLAIMS $5 MILLION AGAINST NUCLEAR WEAPONS LAB

Anthony T. Rivera, an award-winning senior engineer who blew the whistle on safety violations at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, sued the lab today in U.S. District Court in San Francisco. His suit seeks $5 million in damages – and a court order reforming U.S. Department of Energy practices.

Rivera, a 29-year employee with Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, charges Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC is liable for wrongful termination in violation of public policy because managers fired him after he disclosed safety violations in the lab’s high explosives test facility and alleged mismanagement.

His suit also seeks damages against two U.S. Department of Energy officials – Kimberly Davis Lebak, the DOE/NNSA site manager at Livermore in 2013, and Shiwali Patel, a DOE Office of Hearings and Appeals investigator who refused to investigate Rivera’s claims.

The suit says Lebak and Patel punished Rivera for exercising his First Amendment freedom of speech when he complained of unsafe practices and management misdeeds.

​Citing the Administrative Procedures Act of 1789, Rivera also asks the court to order DOE’s National Nuclear Security Administration and its Office of Hearings and Appeals to reform their operations so as to protect whistleblowers in practice.
​Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC manages the principal U.S. nuclear arms lab.

​Rivera is represented by Atty. Tony Bothwell of San Francisco.
Anonymous said...
The next steps are an out of court settlement for a few hundred $k and we will never hear a thing more about this. Happens all the time at Los Alamos.
Really? Since when is Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC the principal U.S. nuclear arms lab? Come on man! LANS needs to file a counter lawsuit against this Bothwell and Rivera for damages of misrepresentation and fraud

Comments

Anonymous said…
No surprise, then, that Lebak has been promoted and sent to Los Alamos...
Anonymous said…
Smart guy. Why let only the LLC executives get all the cash?

More employees should follow this guy's example. He'll be set for life.
Anonymous said…
You don't think for a minute that LLNS Executives (with their suite of lawyers) will allow money to be taken from their pockets? They will fight to the end for thi;, the only they LLNS/LLNS fights for is more money, more money, and more money!
Anonymous said…
What's the real story here ? Does Rivera have the leverage (that is, proof of management wrongdoing or purposefully dangerous working conditions/operations) that can win him the case ?
Anonymous said…
"What's the real story here ? Does Rivera have the leverage (that is, proof of management wrongdoing or purposefully dangerous working conditions/operations) that can win him the case ?"

The answer to your question may depend upon those evaluating the allegations, DOE/NNSA, or the U.S. District Court.
Anonymous said…
"Former Livermore Employee Files Wrongful Termination Lawsuit"

Alissa Tabirian
NS&D Monitor
1/22/2016

"Former Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) employee Anthony Rivera on Tuesday filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court seeking $5 million in damages for alleged wrongful termination. Rivera is suing LLNL ..."


 http://www.exchangemonitor.com/publications/nuclear-security-deterrence/issues/vol-20-no-3/former-livermore-employee-files-wrongful-termination-lawsuit/?display=login&returnURL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Eexchangemonitor%2Ecom%2Fpublications%2Fnuclear%2Dsecurity%2Ddeterrence%2Fissues%2Fvol%2D20%2Dno%2D3%2Fformer%2Dlivermore%2Demployee%2Dfiles%2Dwrongful%2Dtermination%2Dlawsuit%2F
Anonymous said…
This guy is not an engineer. Why bother.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!