What Went Wrong with the Los Alamos Contract?
Physics Today, March 2016
http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/magazine/physicstoday/article/69/3/10.1063/PT.3.3103
"I can't in all good conscious say there is nothing wrong with the LANS model, because if there is nothing wrong model, we wouldn't be in a place where four [extensions] are missed", say Tyler Przbylek
Physics Today, March 2016
http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/magazine/physicstoday/article/69/3/10.1063/PT.3.3103
"I can't in all good conscious say there is nothing wrong with the LANS model, because if there is nothing wrong model, we wouldn't be in a place where four [extensions] are missed", say Tyler Przbylek
Comments
What Went Right with the Los Alamos Contract?
The outsiders were OK, it was the UC holdovers that spoiled the result.
April 28, 2016 at 11:28 AM
Other way around, the outsiders destroyed the lab.
April 27, 2016 at 7:17 AM
Why would they want to? Almost no one in the Pentagon wants anything to do with nukes anymore. Or research in general, for that matter.
Who cares about the LANS contract? Nobody.
April 29, 2016 at 4:48 PM
The managers that work for LANS are American taxpayers and they have financially benefited greatly...as for the the rest of the American taxpayers not so much.
April 29, 2016 at 7:27 PM"
Oh there are plenty of LLNL employees who care about LLNL, they just can't get a word in edgewise with all of the LANL gum flapping on this blog.
Please let me know what fat fob I got out of the LANL and LLNL competitions? I recognize that I am a C student fron. Tier 3 school, but I think I would have the fat job.
Dear anonymous (April 30, 2016: 2:39:
Please let me know what fat job I got out of the LANL and LLNL competitions? Even though I am a C student form a tier 3 school, I think I would have known that I got a fat job.