Skip to main content

More LANL lawsuits to be defended

 Do the taxpayers pay for these lawyers?

The 2013 suit was about a complaint Irving made to his management about how rules concerning VIP visits weren’t being followed. Irving said as a result of his complaint, management called him a “troublemaker” and had him “removed from his security oversight role with regard to VIP visits,” Gilpin said in Irving’s new lawsuit.

http://www.lamonitor.com/content/lans-responds-irving-lawsuit

Comments

Anonymous said…
Irving is a self-important nobody. I'm sure he'll gladly go away with a big enough check in his pocket.
Anonymous said…
"Casey (LANS attorney) also said in the lawsuit that Irving has again failed to "exhaust administrative remedies" with management before filing another lawsuit against LANL"

Ha ha. Specifying your concerns to LANS management, Staff Relations, or the ECP, just helps them "paper the file" against you. You can't force an employee to use a contractor's "administrative remedies" if they are widely believed to be pro-management and corrupt. The July 2016 GAO report on DOE whistleblowers essentially concluded there is no safe haven to report employee concerns at DOE facilities.
Anonymous said…
This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA. The opinions stated are personal opinions
Anonymous said…
The opinions stated are impacted friends of LLNL and anyone expose. This BLOG is LLNL injustice against present waste and past for personal privatization opinions, to express their employees of the Lab LLNS/DOE/NNSA and waste expose taxpayers, wrongdoing and any kind of employees and by the privatization of the Lab.
Anonymous said…
And of spelling skills at LLNL
Anonymous said…
My leg hurts.
Anonymous said…
Seriously, LANL needs it's own blog. Getting tired of reading all the LANL problems in a LLNL specific forum.
Anonymous said…
Getting tired of reading all the LANL problems in a LLNL specific forum.

September 8, 2016 at 9:06 PM

Maybe you should just take a nap.
Anonymous said…
Maybe you should just take a nap.

September 9, 2016 at 8:23 AM

If she's at LLNL, she already is.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem

From the Huffington Post Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/25/work-words_n_5159868.html?utm_hp_ref=business&ir=Business When we replace a specific task with a vague expression, we grant the task more magnitude than it deserves. If we don't describe an activity plainly, it seems less like an easily achievable goal and more like a cloudy state of existence that fills unknowable amounts of time. A fog of fast and empty language has seeped into the workplace. I say it's time we air it out, making room for simple, concrete words, and, therefore, more deliberate actions. By striking the following 26 words from your speech, I think you'll find that you're not quite as overwhelmed as you thought you were. Count the number that LLNLs mangers use.  touch base circle back bandwidth - impactful - utilize - table the discussion deep dive - engagement - viral value-add - one-sheet deliverable - work product - incentivise - take it to the ...