Was this the first time in history a DOE OHA appeal decision was "vacated" (made null and void)?
And the race to the bottom continues...
I don't know if it was the first time in history an OHA appeal decision was vacated. However, the DOE 708 process does state the following: "The Secretary will reverse or revise an appeal decision by the OHA Director only under extraordinary circumstances."
Anyone else notice who was the DoE official that made the decision that was vacated / overturned? None other than Kim Laback, now the head of the LANL site office.
"DOE Announces Spirit Of Concern For Whistleblowers"http://www.ladailypost.com/content/doe-announces-spirit-concern-whistleblowers
"DOE Whistleblower Case Finally Wins A Hearing" http://www.ladailypost.com/content/doe-whistleblower-case-finally-wins-hearing
This guy is not an engineer. He should be fired.
Post a Comment
Submit candidates for new topics here only. Stay on topic with National Labs' related issues. All submissions are screened first for ...
7 comments:
Was this the first time in history a DOE OHA appeal decision was "vacated" (made null and void)?
And the race to the bottom continues...
I don't know if it was the first time in history an OHA appeal decision was vacated. However, the DOE 708 process does state the following:
"The Secretary will reverse or revise an appeal decision by the OHA Director only under extraordinary circumstances."
Anyone else notice who was the DoE official that made the decision that was vacated / overturned? None other than Kim Laback, now the head of the LANL site office.
"DOE Announces Spirit Of Concern For Whistleblowers"
http://www.ladailypost.com/content/doe-announces-spirit-concern-whistleblowers
"DOE Whistleblower Case Finally Wins A Hearing"
http://www.ladailypost.com/content/doe-whistleblower-case-finally-wins-hearing
This guy is not an engineer. He
should be fired.
Post a Comment