Skip to main content

Mattis

Mattis is on the record that the US should change from a nuclear triad to a nuclear diad, and shelve the land based missile leg. If the Senate confirms him as the Secretary of Defense, this might be an area where the national labs get some attention.
December 2, 2016 at 4:03 AM
 Delete
Anonymous Anonymous said...
Mattis and Riley Bechtel serve together in California, so not much will change.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Mattis has only been retired a couple of years. The law requires 7 years. He will need a new law which Dems will oppose. Nomination DOA.
Anonymous said…
Not good! We get rid of those and Russia will have warheads freed up for other targets near or in more populated areas. If anything, we should have MORE land bases with nuke missiles spread out all over the middle of knowhere USA.
Anonymous said…
He also is proponent of redeploying the suppository nuclear weapon,..a SNM gun device...
Anonymous said…
Great idea! Base more missles in sparsely used areas like Superblock at LLNL, the DAF in Nevada, Hanford (next to the leaking tanks and non functioning waste glassification plant), Germantown, F Canyon at SRS, H Canyon at SRS, K Area at SRS, and the fully non functioning PF4 at Los Alamos.
Anonymous said…
Maybe Gen. Mattis knows something we don't. Like the land based systems are so antiquated they don't actually work today. '70's computers, electronics, timing systems, etc...the stuff I used in graduate school that had tubes and transistors. LOL
Anonymous said…
Dear Mr. Putin (Vlad)

Don't worry about our land base nuclear missile systems as they don't actually work. Please remove them from your list of targets.

Sincerely
Dec 6, 2016 @ 10:30PM
Anonymous said…
Putting aside the usual snark that crops up in these threads, it is worth examining who will be offering advice to the new administration on nuclear weapons and related topics. For certain, it will not be any of the 3 present Lab Directors, since they were all fully behind the losing candidate.
Anonymous said…
Love it ! Maybe cut a deal with Russia to jointly target North Korea. It's worth noting that our current Space Program is a joint operation with the Russians, as far as the ISS and other international science endeavors. Despite the Hillary/DNC crap about Russia they are not our enemies. In what shooting war did we ever fight the Russians ? Chinese on the other hand (remember Korea) that's another problem.
Anonymous said…
Maybe NK will pick up the surplus Titans and Minuteman IIIs.
Anonymous said…
In what shooting war did we ever fight the Russians ?

December 9, 2016 at 3:03 PM

Russian pilots flew MIGs against our USAF in Korea.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!