This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA.
The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore,
The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them.
Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted.
Blog author serves as a moderator.
For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com
Blog rules
Stay on topic.
No profanity, threatening language, pornography.
NO NAME CALLING.
No political debate.
Posts and comments are posted several times a day.
74 questions to DOE and not one on its nuclear weapons program - which is over 40% of DOE's budget. Trump doesn't even know what DOE does. Take about zero intellectual curiosity among this incoming administration.
Here are the ones they should push on: 61,64,65 61 - Is there a readily available list of any technologies or products that have emerged from DOE S4 programs or the labs that are currently offered in the market without any subsidy? It would be great to see the DOE labs pushed to do practical development. Maybe the LDRD tax could be converted into commercialization funds to encourage us to work with companies.
Companies don't want to work with the labs, because the labs are too expensive and too risky, and because the paperwork burden is enormous. It takes special unusual circumstances for commercial partnerships to make sense to the commercial partners, and no amount of money shuffling and incentivization at the labs will change that.
5 comments:
Interesting. Whoever did the asking knows little about the DOE bureaucracy.
Said like a true bureaucrat. Whomever did the asking only needs to know one thing about bureaucracy: there is too much of it and heads need to roll.
74 questions to DOE and not one on its nuclear weapons program - which is over 40% of DOE's budget. Trump doesn't even know what DOE does. Take about zero intellectual curiosity among this incoming administration.
Here are the ones they should push on:
61,64,65
61 - Is there a readily available list of any technologies or products that have emerged from DOE S4 programs or the labs that are currently offered in the market without any subsidy?
It would be great to see the DOE labs pushed to do practical development. Maybe the LDRD tax could be converted into commercialization funds to encourage us to work with companies.
Companies don't want to work with the labs, because the labs are too expensive and too risky, and because the paperwork burden is enormous. It takes special unusual circumstances for commercial partnerships to make sense to the commercial partners, and no amount of money shuffling and incentivization at the labs will change that.
Post a Comment