Skip to main content

Get ready!

  1. Get ready, the budget axe will be coming down hard on the DOE and it will happen very quickly:

    *******
    TRUMP TEAM PREPARES DRAMATIC CUTS (The Hill, January 19th)

    Donald Trump is ready to take an ax to government spending.

    Staffers for the Trump transition team have been meeting with career staff at the White House ahead of Friday’s presidential inauguration to outline their plans for shrinking the federal bureaucracy, The Hill has learned.

    The changes they propose are dramatic.

    The departments of Commerce and Energy would see major reductions in funding, with programs under their jurisdiction either being eliminated or transferred to other agencies. The departments of Transportation, Justice and State would see significant cuts and program eliminations.

    thehill.com/policy/finance/314991-trump-team-prepares-dramatic-cuts
    Comment:
  2. From the Hill article:

    ... "At the Department of Energy, it would roll back funding for nuclear physics and advanced scientific computing research to 2008 levels."


    That would mean all of the increases due to bigger annual budgets, inflation adjustments, etc. over the last 8 years of Obama would be totally wiped out. These cuts in real terms would be very significant. I wouldn't worry about finding new employees to replace staff that are retiring from the NSNA labs. Instead, you may need to start worrying about that dreaded word: "RIF".

    Quickly putting the labs under DOD might help insulate the NNSA weapon labs from future cuts, though.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Here's the Heritage Foundation Budget Book Trump staffers are using as a guide:
http://budgetbook.heritage.org

Fusion research would be reduced to 2008 levels. Nonproliferation, safeguards, weapons dismantling reduced to 2014 levels. Lots of energy programs eliminated. Pretty substantial cuts but still has to be approved by Congress.

But I'd still recommend polishing off your resume.
Anonymous said…
It is well to keep in mind that a President's proposed budgets are always DOA in Congress, even when the same party controls the executive and congress.
Anonymous said…
If you are working on ICF, you should definitely polish your resume. There will be strong pressure to kill off funding, and even the inevitable compromise will be a big hit.
Anonymous said…
I'm sure glad we elected an "outsider" with zero experience.
Anonymous said…
Good maybe we can get rid of Ron Darbee. Doug Larson should be fired for putting such an uneducated jerk in charge of some of the best Techs at the Lab. We can only hope!
Anonymous said…
Lots of hanger on old timers need to retire at LLNL anyway. Double dipping, over-compensated and pandered, ....

Cut the fat !

Many of my old colleagues, sorry !

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!