Skip to main content

ISIS bombing lamented

Image
By scooby
'March for Science’ Group Laments Trump’s Bombing Of ‘Marginalized’ ISIS Fighters

http://dailycaller.com/2017/04/13/march-for-science-group-laments-trumps-bombing-of-marginalized-isis-fighters/

Comments

Anonymous said…
Linked within the same article, http://dailycaller.com/2017/03/23/dc-science-march-organizers-racked-by-infighting-over-diversity/ Even organizers are dropping like flies, yet APS still endorses them.
4/14/2017 10:33 PM
Anonymous said…
What idiots ! Bomb baby bomb ! Crush ISIS into the dust !
4/14/2017 11:15 PM
Anonymous said…
Allahu Akbar! Crush infidels into the dust! That ok with you?
4/15/2017 10:18 AM
Anonymous said…
There you have it -- 11:15 and 10:18 summarizing world opinion.
4/16/2017 1:30 PM
Anonymous said…
No, 11:15 was summarizing US liberal/progressive opinion against any violence anywhere anytime. 10:18 was summarizing world-wide Islamist fundamentalist opinion. Guess who wins when the brutality starts?
4/16/2017 9:37 PM
Anonymous said…
"No, 11:15 was summarizing US liberal/progressive opinion against any violence anywhere anytime. 10:18 was summarizing world-wide Islamist fundamentalist opinion. Guess who wins when the brutality starts?"

Thanks Boys/Gals !

Which Lab engineered the MOAB ? Good job !

I saw the LMSC THAD interceptor missile in Sunnyvale some years ago. Very impressive ! Looked like two stages. Also saw the Trident. At least 6 ft in diameter and 30 ft long. Lots of room for MIRV's !
4/16/2017 9:44 PM
Anonymous said…
The Trident is ancient and needs upgrading/replacement. It was meant for 1960's Cold War threats that no longer exist. The THAAD is of no use for ICBM intercepts, which the entire free world is in need of. Israel needs THAAD for SCUD - like missiles from Hezbollah or Hamas. Iran currently exceeds that capability. No one, including the US, is capable of countering the kinds of threats posed by NK and Iran. NK has successfully tested a 6k mile range ICBM (Japan, Hawaii, and Canada). Doesn't need a heavy nuclear warhead - a large canister of Sarin will do more damage than anyone is willing to accept. A much more reliable mid-range NK missile launched in mid-Pacific from a ship will reach CA, WA, OR, NV, and AZ with a nuke. Complacency is a massive mistake.
4/17/2017 8:59 PM
Anonymous said…
One physicist's opinion on "March for Science", http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/04/21/physicists-take-on-march-for-science.html
4/22/2017 7:45 PM
Anonymous said…
"The THAAD is of no use for ICBM intercepts"

Lockheed strongly disagrees,

http://www.star-telegram.com/news/local/community/fort-worth/article146295249.html

As for Trident, if it works why change it ?

I would change the kinetic "kill" warhead on the THAAD to a tactical Nuke however.

There is also a "wild" claim in some defense quarters that we have "brilliant pebbles" type ICBM killer satellites in orbit. Top Secret.
4/24/2017 10:05 AM
Anonymous said…
Another interesting link, THAAD in testing, explanation of US ICBM intercept strategy (AEGIS, THAAD, PATRIOT),

http://www.military-today.com/missiles/thaad.htm
4/24/2017 10:27 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

By scooby
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
155 comments
Read more

Trump is to gut the labs.

By scooby
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.
124 comments
Read more

LLNL un-diversity

By scooby
Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!
79 comments
Read more