Skip to main content

LANL employees worried

Image
By scooby
LANL employees worried that next contractor will be forced to restrict retirement and benefits to 105% of industry standard


“That is the concern of folks that have invested a lot of time in the laboratory, what’s going to happen to my retirement, what’s going to happen to my benefits.” Jekowski said. “The way I read the draft RFP, they’re marching more toward industry standards for benefits packages. “There’s a rule of thumb that’s used now that bidders can’t offer more than a 105 percent of the benefits that would be identified by a statistical analysis by credentialed benefits providers.”



http://www.lamonitor.com/content/lanl-coalition-mulls-benefits-new-contract

Comments

Anonymous said…
Good reason to be angry and scared to publicly act out. You guys and LLNL employees were f,,ked over by the last contract.

That anger is the main reason all lab employees hate z
DOE, NNSA, Bodman, Pryzbylek, DAgostino and entered the 3 blogs millions of time.

You got f,,,ked and you will get fu..ed again.

The terms of the new contract are designed specifically to hurt current employees.

So now you hate the NNSA too.
8/15/2017 11:36 PM
Anonymous said…
I believe the 105% threshold was put into TCP1 in 2006. What is new?
8/16/2017 5:52 PM
Anonymous said…
Unless and until the retirees form a collective bargaining unit, there is no motivation for benefits to remain static.
8/17/2017 5:22 PM
Anonymous said…
And if the retirees don't get their way, what are they going to do, go on strike?

8/17/2017 6:32 PM
Anonymous said…
Unless and until the retirees form a collective bargaining unit, there is no motivation for benefits to remain static.

August 17, 2017 at 5:22 PM

Right, non-employees are going to "collectively bargain" with an entity which is not their employer? The "motivation" you are looking for is not some union-based nonsense, but simple legal and contractual requirements for the government to maintain equivalent treatment of current and former contract employees at the same facility, not a complicated concept.
8/17/2017 7:47 PM
Anonymous said…
At LLNL after the 2008 debacle I slowed down my work pace. Went home on time, even early. Came in 1/2 late regularly. Took on fewer volunteer organization improvement tasks. Ignored when people in my group cut corners, Learned to love the 9/80. Stopped looking for efficiencies, instead looked to reward employees with local perks. Figured they cost me 15%, so sought to do 15% less work. They still gave awards. Same work cost a lot more $ though. Never bought into new management, undermined it when logical and not safety related. Complained constantly. Travelled the extra day Malicious compliance. And costs went up.
8/18/2017 11:44 PM
Anonymous said…
Stopped being type A,
8/18/2017 11:46 PM
Anonymous said…
What? Me worry?
8/19/2017 9:15 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

By scooby
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
155 comments
Read more

Trump is to gut the labs.

By scooby
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.
124 comments
Read more

LLNL un-diversity

By scooby
Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!
79 comments
Read more