Skip to main content

When Charlie met Janet.

Image
By scooby
Topic for Janet when she and Charlie have their mutual admiration meeting:

Please provide a list of all tangible contributions that UC has made to operating LLNL and LANL in the past 25 years. For each one listed clearly indicate how it was specifically unique to the UC.

Other posters welcome to offer suggestions.

Comments

Anonymous said…
No list because no UC contributions in past 25 years.
8/19/2017 12:31 PM
Anonymous said…
Federalize!
8/19/2017 10:51 PM
Anonymous said…
Federalize!

August 19, 2017 at 10:51 PM


Which will drop everyone's salary by 40%, not just Charlie.
8/20/2017 10:21 AM
Anonymous said…


Looks like UC is putting in a bid and Bechtel is out! One other bit of minor good news is that our anti-UC troll will be going absoutly berserk about this.
8/21/2017 9:00 PM
Anonymous said…
Bechtel will bid with Battelle.
8/23/2017 4:24 AM
Anonymous said…
Bechtel will bid with Battelle.

August 23, 2017 at 4:24 AM


That could well be the winning team for the next ten years, if they carefully pick their Key Personnel.
8/23/2017 5:40 AM
Anonymous said…

Bechtel will bid with Battelle.

August 23, 2017 at 4:24 AM

I hear that Battelle is going with UC, and Bechtel is not bidding.
8/23/2017 9:12 AM
Anonymous said…
I hear that Battelle is going with UC, and Bechtel is not bidding.

August 23, 2017 at 9:12 AM

If you "hear" it, you must be able to tell us who said it. Or you are just hearing things, which is my guess. You should connect with the "rumor has it" guy - you'd have a lot in common. Namely, no facts whatsoever. Maybe you are him?
8/23/2017 8:12 PM
Anonymous said…
THe RFP will change to 2.5% profit and Bechtel will bid with Battelle. Any takers?
8/25/2017 12:04 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

By scooby
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
155 comments
Read more

Trump is to gut the labs.

By scooby
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.
124 comments
Read more

LLNL un-diversity

By scooby
Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!
79 comments
Read more