Blog purpose
This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA.
The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore,
The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them.
Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted.
Blog author serves as a moderator.
For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com
Blog rules
- Stay on topic.
- No profanity, threatening language, pornography.
- NO NAME CALLING.
- No political debate.
- Posts and comments are posted several times a day.
Saturday, September 30, 2017
A new structure?
The new structure for the bid being developed by UC and Bechtel/AECOM It appears the talks between UC and Bechtel and developing a new structure. This structure would be to break the Operations and Projects PADs away from the Science/Technology/Security making each partner responsible for the management, performance, and fee. How would this effect Weapons PAD and program???
My avatar is taken from a favorite scene in the TV series "Supernatural". I may not be one of the Four Horsemen, but I play one in most combat games... :-)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts you viewed tbe most last 30 days
-
So what do the NNSA labs do under the the 2nd Trump administration ? What are the odds we will have a test?
-
Do you remember how hard it was to get a Q clearance? You needed a good reputation, good credit and you couldn't lie about anything. We...
-
Tax dollars gone to waste for the "chili cookoff" http://www.sandia.gov/LabNews/100730.html Rumor has it this project didn't a...
9 comments:
NOT an option according to the draft RFP. While this pie-in-the-sky arrangement might be attractive, it is DOA at NNSA.
Again I am hearing that UC is NOT teaming with Bechtel anymore. Maybe they talked but it fell apart. I think Bechtel is seen as utterly toxic at this point.
Could be an option under an internal agreement but they cannot propose this.
Desperate situations must take desperate actions!
UC and Bechtel-Jacobs have been in bed together so long it hardly makes any difference what we call it. Whatever the name, it has been a disaster for Los Aamos, US science, and our National Defense.
The structure might seem different on paper, but the "past performance" grading on their bid would score the exact same as LANS, huge negative. So why do it.
The structure might seem different on paper, but the "past performance" grading on their bid would score the exact same as LANS, huge negative. So why do it.
October 2, 2017 at 5:44 AM
Based on the interested parties release, because no one else is interested....
Based on the interested parties release, because no one else is interested....
October 3, 2017 at 12:13 AM
Except the list shows many are interested. Why do you insist on saying things that are obviously false and easily checked?
The list is full of small players that cannot Prime. There are only three big players on the published list and two are current partners. (Bechtel: current, BWXT: current, GD)
Truth is they will hold out for a better deal before expressing interest.
Post a Comment