Skip to main content

Queen Tauscher - Good, Bad, or Ugly?

The appointment of Ellen Tauscher as an Executive Committee Governor of the Boards of Governors of the Los Alamos National Security, LLC and Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, effective February 16, 2018, replacing Norman Pattiz, be approved.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Ellen is impressive, savvy and well connected.
Anonymous said…
Ha, what a joke. She is a Hillary sycophant, an anti stockpile unilateral disarmament through complex distraction kook, and she is quite ugly.
Anonymous said…
She's a savvy political player. Her career took a hit when she was diagnosed with cancer and since winning that battle she's been parlaying her past political clout into opportunities to rake in the dough. When she went to congress covering the district that LLNL was in, she made the usual I support you statements to get in and then showed her true colors. What side is she on? - Hers.
Anonymous said…
8:42 ---
Wow! The misogyny runs deep with you!
Anonymous said…
Yep, any opposition to a woman is misogyny.
Anonymous said…
Nope, it's the "and she is quite ugly" part.

Anonymous said…
Did you note the question posed in the post title?
Anonymous said…
Don't use facts. It annoys liberals.
Anonymous said…
The only "fact" revealed by the post title is that Scooby and Evil are also misogynistic jerks. Do you always feel compelled to seriously answer offensive questions?
GreggS said…
September 22, 2017 at 8:06 AM

I strongly suggest you take time studying the dictionary and learn the true meaning of those big words you sling about carelessly. Just because someone has differing opinions does not entitle you to brand them as bigots.

Locking this thread....

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

Rumor corner

LLNS may have excluded the wrong people in last VSSOP? The exclusions were based on outdated job categories and related skills. ULM are now thinking that in the future, job categories and functional areas will have to be re-defined. The next VSSOP/ISP will be based on the new categories and functional areas. The questions I have are: 1) Why didnt they think of that before the transition. It seems like their style is “change things as you go”. Planning is out the window! 2) Who will give input on the new changes? The next RIF apparently is going to be more lucrative than the VSSOP. Depending on the length of employment, a RIFed person, not only gets their 1 week pay per year of service but also from 30 to 120 days notice, essentially 30 to 120 days pay. Please feel free to comment on the rumors or add new ones you actually heard.