New Mexico’s two U.S. senators have successfully added an amendment to a major defense funding bill to help protect Los Alamos National Laboratory’s role as the nation’s producer of plutonium pits, the triggers for nuclear weapons.
https://www.abqjournal.com/109799/los-alamos.html
Pits baby, they keepan NM good!
Blog purpose
This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA.
The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore,
The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them.
Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted.
Blog author serves as a moderator.
For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com
Blog rules
- Stay on topic.
- No profanity, threatening language, pornography.
- NO NAME CALLING.
- No political debate.
- Posts and comments are posted several times a day.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts you viewed tbe most last 30 days
-
So what do the NNSA labs do under the the 2nd Trump administration ? What are the odds we will have a test?
-
Do you remember how hard it was to get a Q clearance? You needed a good reputation, good credit and you couldn't lie about anything. We...
-
Tax dollars gone to waste for the "chili cookoff" http://www.sandia.gov/LabNews/100730.html Rumor has it this project didn't a...
5 comments:
Lets ne honest LANL is really the only viable place to build pits. Even if you spent a huge amount of money to build some new facility you would just end with the same kind of things that go along with pit production. You can bash LANL all you want but it is not going anywhere and most of the criticism is all hype and always has been hype.
too bad LLNL.
too bad LLNL.
November 21, 2017 at 1:50 PM
Come on it would be impossible to build pits in LLNL there is simply no way the people in the bay area would allow. There is no room and no capability. What would be the advantage to making new facilities elsewhere which would cost huge amounts of money with no added benefit.
November 21, 2017 at 7:02 PM
LLNL's Site 300 is 11 square miles size, which gives it an adequate buffer zone. I believe that moving 332 SNM related operations there has been considered in the past.
2.42pm there is no way in hell people in the Bay Area would ever allow this.
Post a Comment