Skip to main content

Where is Waldo (Terry Wallace)?

Where is Waldo (Terry Wallace)?

Comments

Anonymous said…

Not sure where he is but I think he is still around. He seemed very bitter the last few months with LANS. Kinda of strange, I would think he would be happy that he got something at least. I guess he really thought that he should be the Director for years and years. Someone pointed out just how vindictive he is, so I think he blames others for why LANS fails. My guess he felt that he was always going to be the next Director after McMillian but it would be with LANS for 5-10 years. LANS was thrown out and that was that so someone is at fault.
Anonymous said…
Wallace should not make the mistake of several recent and not-so-recent Directors, of comparing themselves favorably with Oppenheimer, Bradbury, Agnew, Hecker, and even Browne (forget Kerr). Not in the same class, not even close. Wallace's Mommy's influence got him his upper management job, not his (lack of) qualifications.
Anonymous said…
That last part is quite an extrapolation.
Terry has a new office, and was in DC this week helping with transition related discussions.
Anonymous said…
Wallace was far better than any of the three Livermore carpetbaggers. He was also far better than Nanos and Kerr. That puts him right in the middle with Brown. Neither he nor Brown ever understood the mission of the Lab. Neither he nor Brown had the necessary background. He had far fewer “incidents” under his watch and handled them well. Edge to Wallace. Admittedly, that’s a pretty low bar, but the days of Bradbury and Agnew are long gone. Mason will be fighting for a middle seat in this bimodal distribution. Unless he is a total screw up, his legacy there is all but guaranteed.
Anonymous said…
"Wallace was far better than any of the three Livermore carpetbaggers."

Ok that is true so at least Wallace is a zero rather than a negative.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!