Skip to main content

DOE keeps the public in tbe dark

https://www.postregister.com/opinion/guest_column/doe-must-explain-high-level-waste-reclassification/article_6d37ada9-c31e-5cee-9e57-eefa842730d9.html

Comments

Anonymous said…


Well a more important question is what is going to happen to the NNSA labs now that it is clear that Trump is going to removed due the clear evidence that he told Cohen to lie about his collusion with Russian to get him elected. It is hard to imagine that
Trump got to two years but they have him now. Again this could really change the labs.
Anonymous said…
The 8:43 am "NeverTrumper" comment is off topic.
Anonymous said…
January 19, 2019 at 8:43 AM is a little behind the news, apparently.

Trump will be removed from office no later than January 2025.
Anonymous said…
Way, way off topic and indicative of a serious disease, TDS.
Anonymous said…
8:43 is lost in the fabricated world of Buzzfeed, MSNBC, and the New York Times. Mueller's team made an announcement that the Buzzfeed article is not accurate. 8:43 should make an effort to keep up.
Anonymous said…

I would claim it is on topic since polices of the president will have implications for the labs. The question of when he will be removed is an open question. It could happen very fast right after Mueller makes his report if Trump resigns and has Pence pardon him. Or it could not and Trump could finish his term or simply resign the day before he is to leave office, which would kind of fun to have Pence as President for a day or so. The odds of Trump going beyond one term is very very low. If you look at the votes last time it was 1/3 Trump, 1/3 Clinton and 1/3 did not vote. This time expect that 1/3 who did not vote to vote againts Trump, heck it does have to be the whole of this 1/3 just a larger portion than before which is alamos a certain. .
Anonymous said…
The 11:07 am "NeverTrumper" # 2, comment is also off topic. Scooby?
Anonymous said…
11:07 is making stuff up again. Real Clear Politics has Trump's approval rating at 41% so he's already above 1/3. This is the average of all polls - some have him higher and some lower. Trump's approval rating has climbed from his all-time low of 37 percent in Dec. 2017, although he has dropped 3 points from 44% in June of last year.

The real question is can the democrats field a candidate who can get more than Trump's 41%. That is by no means a given. Pelosi, for example, is at 34.5% favorable. Schumer is at a miserably low 30.7% favorable. Whatever Biden's favorable rating is, it will likely drop when the videos of his creepy behavior get seen by more people. Look up "Biden Groping Young Girls in Public" on Youtube. Watch the videos yourself.
Anonymous said…
This is now all off topic. But it seems everyone now suffers from TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome) or TWS (Trump Worship Syndrome). Either syndrome destroys brain cells and increases bouts of irrationality and lessening of overall intelligence. Time for CDC to declare an epidemic.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!