Wednesday, January 9, 2019
What is the future for the workforce at the NNA labs?
"Will an AI take YOUR job in 2019? China's leading expert warns it will take over HALF of jobs within 15 years (and reveals the most at risk careers)"
THE TEN MOST ENDANGERED JOBS FROM AI
Telemarketer / telesales
Customer support
Warehouse workers
Clerks and operational staff
Telephone operators
Teller/cashier
Fast food workers
Dish washers
Assembly line inspector
Not sure that half the jobs at the NNSA labs are in danger but maybe 1/4?
JOBS AN AI CAN AND CAN'T DO
THE JOBS AI WILL TAKE OVER FIRST
Sales and Marketing Research
Insurance adjuster
Security guards
Truck drivers
Consumer loan underwriter
Financial and sports journalists
Bookkeepers & Financial Analysts
Fruit pickers
Investment professionals
Radiologist
JOBS AN AI WON'T BE ABLE TO DO
Psychiatrists
Therapists
Medical caregivers
AI researchers and engineers
Fiction writers
Teachers
Criminal defense attorney
Computer Scientists & Engineers
Scientists
Managers (actually leaders)
Hmm, well the NNSA labs don't have many scientists left and there certainly are no "actual leaders" so maybe 1/2 the workforce
will be in danger.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
The article leads off with the 10 most endangered jobs and I see 9 listed. If AI is based off of the counting ability of the latest generation of folks populating the schools these days, I foresee a few glitches along the way.
Also, uhmm, there are no existing artificially intelligent systems, nor will there be any time soon. Notwithstanding the hype and marketing. (For sure, robotic systems and assorted software systems have replaced human laborers. Those systems are not intelligent, except to the extent that their marketers label them thus.)
At best, "AI" (really pseudo-AI) is being used to aid workers as tools to help make better decisions and improve efficiency. It's amusing that this article claims that AI will never replace psychiatrists when "AI" tools are ALREADY being used by psychiatrists to aid in their decision making. If "AI" improves their efficiency enough, it might result in the net loss of a few psychiatrists' jobs.
It seems like the author could easily be replaced by a mediocre AI troll program.
Post a Comment