This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA.
The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore,
The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them.
Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted.
Blog author serves as a moderator.
For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com
Blog rules
Stay on topic.
No profanity, threatening language, pornography.
NO NAME CALLING.
No political debate.
Posts and comments are posted several times a day.
Friday, November 8, 2019
No-rehire list?
Anybody in HR....uhhhh....Strategic Human Resources Management (man we're pretentious) ever here about a "no rehire" list?
3 comments:
Anonymous
said...
Is someone asking about Ed Moses by any chance?
Humor aside, when I took the buy out in 2013 I was told I could not come back to the lab for at least 1 year. Hopefully the fellow that was caught stealing copper for a number of years would be on that list if it exists.
"Anybody in HR....uhhhh....Strategic Human Resources Management (man we're pretentious) ever here about a "no rehire" list?"
Why would HR (SHRM) have such a list? Any "no-hire" or "black list" would have very limited non-paper management participation probably at the division level of the hiring organization. A broader recipient list (SHMR), would be too vulnerable to disclosure.
3 comments:
Is someone asking about Ed Moses by any chance?
Humor aside, when I took the buy out in 2013 I was told I could not come back to the lab for at least 1 year. Hopefully the fellow that was caught stealing copper for a number of years would be on that list if it exists.
No but if you steal or violate security protocol I would imagine you could be on such a list.
"Anybody in HR....uhhhh....Strategic Human Resources Management (man we're pretentious) ever here about a "no rehire" list?"
Why would HR (SHRM) have such a list? Any "no-hire" or "black list" would have very limited non-paper management participation probably at the division level of the hiring organization. A broader recipient list (SHMR), would be too vulnerable to disclosure.
Post a Comment