From the Huffington Post Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/25/work-words_n_5159868.html?utm_hp_ref=business&ir=Business When we replace a specific task with a vague expression, we grant the task more magnitude than it deserves. If we don't describe an activity plainly, it seems less like an easily achievable goal and more like a cloudy state of existence that fills unknowable amounts of time. A fog of fast and empty language has seeped into the workplace. I say it's time we air it out, making room for simple, concrete words, and, therefore, more deliberate actions. By striking the following 26 words from your speech, I think you'll find that you're not quite as overwhelmed as you thought you were. Count the number that LLNLs mangers use. touch base circle back bandwidth - impactful - utilize - table the discussion deep dive - engagement - viral value-add - one-sheet deliverable - work product - incentivise - take it to the ...
Comments
I agree but the problem is where are you going to get talented PhDs in science and engineering? If you look at any graduate program in these fields there are few American and the ones that are there are not exactly the top of the class. At one point you could attract some of the best people to LLN/LANL/Sandia. No one believes this is true now.
True, but are the NNSA labs doing national security research? I could argue that private labs or private companies are doing cutting edge national security work but NNSA labs...not so much.
"Private labs" and "private companies" are not doing TS (NSI or RD) research on nuclear security or nuclear weapons.