Skip to main content

LANL contract competition



The NNSA expects contract competition to manage LANL will yield $76.1 million in cost savings over the potential 10 year life of the contract

https://www.gao.gov/assets/710/704170.pdf

Comments

Anonymous said…

That could have been Bechtel money!!!! Dam you UC.
Anonymous said…
I assume that the cost savings can easily be achieved by cutting benefits.
Anonymous said…
Since the contract is for ten years, the total value is in excess of $20 billion. The projected savings is thus 0.3%. While $75 million is a significant amount, I tend to be skeptical when someone projects a 0.3% savings out ten years. Many things can happen, and the savings may never be realized.
Anonymous said…

2/07/2020 6:04 AM

At 20 billion many things can happen or not happen the point is 20 billions is up to be dissipated, prepare;
Anonymous said…
Please explain "dissipated."
Anonymous said…
Dissipation is the result of an irreversible process that takes place in homogeneous thermodynamic systems. A dissipative process is a process in which energy (internal, bulk flow kinetic, or system potential) is transformed from some initial form to some final form; the capacity of the final form to do mechanical work is less than that of the initial form. For example, heat transfer is dissipative because it is a transfer of internal energy from a hotter body to a colder one. Following the second law of thermodynamics, the entropy varies with temperature (reduces the capacity of the combination of the two bodies to do mechanical work), but never decreases in an isolated system.

These processes produce entropy (see entropy production) at a certain rate. The entropy production rate times ambient temperature gives the dissipated power. Important examples of irreversible processes are: heat flow through a thermal resistance, fluid flow through a flow resistance, diffusion (mixing), chemical reactions, and electrical current flow through an electrical resistance (Joule heating).
Anonymous said…
2/08/2020 8:14 PM

Gotcha, wink wink, nod nod. Yep, some managers are preparing especially after they lost out when LANS lost the contract. That really burned alot of people and they need to figure out how to salvage and or take advantage of the current situation.

One mans dissipation is another mans riches.
Anonymous said…
Once again the American taxpayer is going to be fleeced by the DOE and their cronies. It is shameful.
Anonymous said…
The contract change could very well save a billion or even billions. How much did the improperly packed drums that exploded at WIPP, courtesy of LANS, cost the taxpayer?? $1.5B, last I checked. How much did Rocky Flats cost to clean up and rebuild at LANL and SRS? Billions. If TRIAD can execute without major screwups, unlike the for profit guys, the savings would be many billions.
Anonymous said…
Triad is already screwing up. At least thats what NNSA scores would tell you.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!