Skip to main content

National lab supercomputers to help fight COVID-19

https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/Articles/US-National-Laboratories-supercomputers-to-help-CO

Comments

Anonymous said…
Remember the BG/L - That stood for Blue Gene / Livermore. The Blue was indicative of Big Blue, IBM's moniker in the computing industry, Gene was the intended use, genetic research and L was were it was sited. It came in the door and was placed in the unclassified world as intended but the raw speed it produced (surpassing Purple which hadn't arrived yet) got the attention of the weapons team and it was swung over to the classified network and "repurposed". Since that time, powerful machines have been brought to the open computer centers and the "original" purpose of BG/L has been brought to bear to the nation's needs such as this.
Anonymous said…

The labs are nuclear weapons labs, not epidemic modeling labs. This stuff should not be done at the labs, there is already way too much mission creep. Since when did the labs ever epidemic modeling, biology, or sandbox science?
Anonymous said…
With LANL's history of contamination events, the last thing it should be doing is bio research.
Anonymous said…
I can't speak for LANL, but Livermore had a biomed department up and running when I started at the LLNL in 1974. Since when did the lab do biology, well at least since then. Shift a few parameters around and I bet NARAC would be able to model airborne biological hazards. They were online (as ARAC) for Three Mile Island. It's not mission creep, it's leveraging the tools and the talent to the needs of the nation.
Anonymous said…
What is the problem with every US facility with relevant capability contributing to the fight against this pandemic? You see a difficulty with that?
Anonymous said…
3/28/2020 5:27 PM: scope of funding and little legal matters like appropriations laws...
Anonymous said…
Like you're a lawyer? Not likely. Presidential emergency directives "trump" all that bureaucratic crap.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

tcp1 looking good

I just received my annual TCP-1 letter from LLNS and a summary of the LLNS Pension Plan. Looked in pretty good shape in 2013. About 35% overfunded (funding target attainment percentage = 134.92%). This was a decrease from 2012 where it was 51% overfunded (funding target attainment percentage = 151.59%). They did note that the 2012 change in the law on how liabilities are calculated using interest rates improved the plan's position. Without the change the funding target attainment percentages would have been 118% (2012) and 105% (2013). 2013 assets = $2,057,866,902 2013 liabilities = $1,525,162,784 vs 2012 assets = $1,844,924,947 2012 liabilities = $1,217,043,150 It was also noted that a slightly different calculation method ("fair market value") designed to show a clearer picture of the plan' status as December 31, 2013 had; Assets = $2,403,098,433 Liabilities = $2,068,984,256 Funding ratio = 116.15% Its a closed plan with 3,781 participants. Of that number, 3,151 wer...