Skip to main content

How is Bill doing?

As those before him since the 2007 transition, is LLNL Director Bill Goldstein simply a stooge for the for-profit LLNS LLC contractor? What has being the LLNS "President" meant thus far to LLNL employees besides unjustified mass layoffs and systemic benefit reductions?

Comments

Anonymous said…
Even former LANS Director Charles F. McMillan admitted the for-profit LANS LLC would do whatever was in its own best interest. Got to give McMillan points on that one.
Anonymous said…
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8406967/Democrats-try-ban-Trump-using-nuclear-weapons-stop-hurricanes.html

Democrats try to ban Donald Trump from using nuclear weapons to stop hurricanes after he asked officials why he shouldn't - and as RNC heads for Florida panhandle at height of hurricane season

?? We are going nuke hurricanes. Well at least that is a test.

Actually my understating that this was a prank created on 4chan that was picked up by Axios. It is odd how many online pranks by right wing trolls got picked by the news. Another one was Pepe the Frog and the Ok symbol being white power gestures. All these where made up on 4chan I even remember when they did this. The problem is that under the current climate you can say anything and it will be picked up. For example we could start a new one that people that wear blue jeans are actually doing so as a white supremacy dog whistle. Some evidence for this is that country music singers often wear jeans and we all know counrty music is racist. The world is starting to go nuts, maybe we are in giant simulation and the simulation broke.

Anonymous said…
Bill is an earnest guy trying hard to execute on the missions of the Lab and the management contract dictated by NNSA. I don’t see him being a stooge to work to those ends and try to treat the employees as well as HQ allows. A pure UC nonprofit contract would not have prevented the slide in benefits.

It would be great if it was 1985 again. I’d be 35 years younger and pounds lighter. The Lab was grand. It’s still a pretty sweet deal if you like technical work.
Anonymous said…
The Lab was grand. It’s still a pretty sweet deal if you like technical work.

6/10/2020 9:54 PM

If LLNL has become anything like LANL, the technical work is insignificant compared with the exploding bureaucracy paperwork.
Anonymous said…
Our Director seems to be a good person and capable.
I do notice he walks that line with his SF Liberalism as he tripped out a little with the Trump travel ban awhile back and goes off once in awhile on Immigration.

I hope the Director (as I respect him greatly for being authentic)
doesn't confuse Legal and Illegal Immigration
as most Big Libs do as they try to confuse the percentage of not so smart voters
that seem to exist?

It did seem though that Trump got in his head a little bit of course a far away guess
on my part as like many I'm sure he wants a polite, Globalist POTUS.
Anonymous said…
"doesn't confuse Legal and Illegal Immigration "

Out of curiosity which group do thing is most effected by illegal immigration? It turns out to be the one that all the protests are about. You see the world is a tad bit more complex than "Orange man bad".

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!