Skip to main content

U.S. inertial confinement fusion (ICF) program finding increase

Image
By scooby
ICF funding:

https://www.laserfocusworld.com/lasers-sources/article/14175399/congress-boosts-inertialconfinement-fusion-budget-review-results-expected-by-end-of-fy20

Interesting that pulsed power ICF, which has shown no progress, gets a 30% increase, although the $ amount is small. Thankfully no $$ are being spent to build a new Z machine. This is probably a relief to SNL which has no need for that program.

At least LLE Rochester wasn’t able to extort the government for more money. Their budget remains flat.

Comments

Anonymous said…
At least one Livermore employee has the integrity to admit that they (still) don't know how much energy is required for ignition. That is a far cry from the near certain predictions that sent this $10 billion dollar taxpayer funded train down the tracks.
6/19/2020 12:39 PM
Anonymous said…
"Finding increase"? So they failed another audit?
6/19/2020 5:08 PM
Unknown said…
"At least one Livermore employee has the integrity to admit that they (still) don't know how much energy is required for ignition."
20 MJ or less
Lab employee
6/19/2020 9:04 PM
Anonymous said…
NIF rears its ugly head again here. Every six months or so, like clockwork. Yawn.
6/20/2020 5:11 PM
Anonymous said…
Anonymous said...
NIF rears its ugly head again here. Every six months or so, like clockwork. Yawn.

It’s difficult to talk about anything physics related on the blog. NIF is an important project to those who care about the physics and the field. For those more interested in worrying about how the LLC Is managing the lab, maybe not.
6/23/2020 3:07 PM
Anonymous said…
If only the public (who pays the bills) cared. Think about that.
6/24/2020 5:44 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

By scooby
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
155 comments
Read more

Trump is to gut the labs.

By scooby
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.
124 comments
Read more

LLNL un-diversity

By scooby
Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!
79 comments
Read more