Skip to main content

Disclaimer

 Recently, I received a deluge of posts and comments complaining about why I allow certain comments. 

First, I must maintain impartiality. 

Second,  you don't have to like or believe what you read. 

Third, save yourself typing because any questioning of what I allow/disallow will be ignored. 

Comments

Anonymous said…
I generally agree with your points, but I have to say #3 just shouts out that you do not care what your readers think. If you aren't doing this for them, why are you doing it? Just asking.
Scooby said…
I read many derogatory comments about me from people upset because their comments were deleted. Or people berating me for allowing comments they find "offensive".
If I acted with them in a caring fashion, this blog will lose its purpose. Upset readers shouldn't dump their brain. They must think and format their thoughts!
Anonymous said…
Comments and concerns within the LLNL gates are governed by trepidation. That's a given. Scooby's blog offers an outlet for some of these comments and concerns. Whether or not LLNS management appreciates it or not is another topic, but they are likely a portion of continued blog criticisms, with the hope the blog will dissolve.
GreggS said…
There has been talk of "selective censorship" by some posters for years. If Scooby was not being accused, I was.

Those accusations were and are a big steaming load of bull cookies. Scooby has run this blog with a strong emphasis on being impartial, even to the point of allowing some comments that bother some or most people. The rules for rejection are simple and transparent to visitors here - "Stay on topic. No profanity, threatening language, pornography. NO NAME CALLING. No political debate."

Sometimes a post gets jammed in the review queue. It does not mean the Scooby was being high and mighty, just hasn't been seen by Scooby and approved. These things happen, no malice whatsoever.

Trolls will make up all kinds of ill begotten rumors as "pay back" for not being allowed to create mischief here. Just ignore them, Scooby is a good man who does try his best to be a fair, even-handed moderator.
doobydew said…
Thanks Gregg! You know first hand about moderating!
Unknown said…
"Moderating" literally means eliminating extreme views. It doesn't mean eliminating disputatious views, or contentious views, or argumentative views. Such views can always be presented "moderately," which should mean they are allowed, unless you have your own definition of "moderate" (as an adjective and a verb).
Scooby said…
Since you have an idea on how to moderate a blog, why don't you volunteer as a co-moderator to help me?
GreggS said…
I believe that commentator's 1/24/2022 6:18 PM argument is based off the root word "moderate" vs. "moderator".

Here is what Wikipedia has on the subject Discussion Moderator.

More specifically Internet Forum Moderator.

The second article covers all the issues that have been raised here - hidden cabals that a moderator serves, abusing powers for some personal agenda, yadda yadda. It's old-hat that gets brought up on everything from the old USENET News to Reddit, usually by people who don't get their way or those whose mindset leans toward conspiracy theories.

To squelch any further rumors I can certify that Agent S, err I mean Scooby is not a member of the Men in Black. Proof is available here.

Now go buy your kids some ice cream, let them stay up. And Scooby is not a MIB agent.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!