Skip to main content

russia and Ukraine

 https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2022/01/12/russia-ukraine-putin-war-526967


So possible war of Russia with Ukraine. Will we get involved and will it go nuclear? We might get to do a test after all.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Save your fantasies, The US will not get involved except maybe for the most extreme sanctions possible on most Russian government officials, making it impossible for them to move money anywhere outside Russia. That will really, really hurt Putin and his cronies.
Anonymous said…
1/17/2022 5:15 PM

Perhaps. What I think will happen is that the NATO will not allow Ukraine in and that could be the end of it, no war and no sanctions.
Anonymous said…
The US will never accede to barring Ukraine from UN membership. That decision has already been made.
Anonymous said…
There are any number of scenarios that this administration could use.

1. Send Blankets.
2. Send a strongly worded letter.
3. Go to war.

Option #3 can be used to distract the public from the border situation, Covid mandates, Afghanistan withdrawal and the inflation issue. It can also be used to line the pockets of the military industrial complex. Remember, in chaos there is opportunity.
Anonymous said…
Option #3 can be used to distract the public from the border situation, Covid mandates, Afghanistan withdrawal and the inflation issue. It can also be used to line the pockets of the military industrial complex. Remember, in chaos there is opportunity.

1/19/2022 11:02 AM

Take it easy, that sounds like a conspiracy theory. In Biden's presser today he just told Russia it is all yours, there is not going to be a war.
Anonymous said…
There will certainly be a war, and many will die. The question will be, how many deaths could the US have prevented by a stronger stance against Putin?
Anonymous said…
"The question will be, how many deaths could the US have prevented by a stronger stance against Putin?"

Perhaps if the US was on friendlier terms with Putin maybe there would not be a war at all.
Anonymous said…
Perhaps if the US was on friendlier terms with Putin maybe there would not be a war at all.

1/19/2022 6:19 PM

Yeah, let's be friends with the murderous KGB cretin. Fidel Castro with nuclear weapons.
Anonymous said…
Yeah, let's be friends with the murderous KGB cretin. Fidel Castro with nuclear weapons.

1/20/2022 6:10 PM

You are right, war is the best approach.
Anonymous said…
You are right, war is the best approach.

1/20/2022 8:42 PM

Agreed, especially after having that wimp Trump who never had the stomach for war.
Anonymous said…
You are right, war is the best approach.

1/20/2022 8:42 PM

I didn't suggest war, but Putin is bound for war. We are to surrender without a fight? (And I know: "It isn't our fight.") Yes it is, unless you want Putin dictating what the US must do for the foreseeable future.
Anonymous said…
"I didn't suggest war, but Putin is bound for war. We are to surrender without a fight? "

Agreed war it is. Putin was bound for war since 2016 when he put Trump in office. If we take out Putin now the Russians will not be able to interfere with 2022 and 2024 elections. I do not want to see Putin dictating what the US must do in the future. I do not want war either but I see no other choice if are to save our democracy.
Anonymous said…


All we are saying is give war a chance.
Anonymous said…
"Peace for our time."
Anonymous said…

So we are going get a test of the systems or not?

Anonymous said…
So we are going get a test of the systems or not?

1/23/2022 5:50 PM

Our biological warfare defense system is already under test.
Anonymous said…
1/26/2022 9:21 AM

Yes. The perfect war would be one that disables the adversary's economy with no retaliation.

The perfect weapon would be a virus that mutates faster than antidotes and vaccines can be developed.
Anonymous said…
So we are going get a test of the systems or not?

1/23/2022 5:50 PM

Yep, probably test to failure.
Anonymous said…

More talk that a Russian invasion is almost certain.

So let us war game this.

(1) Russia goes in and NATO and the US do nothing.

(2) Russia goes in and starts a limited shooting war with the US. I doubt 8k US troops are going to do much but at least we tried.
Biden Blames Trump and the media declares this a great victory. Neil Young is sent into exile to Winnipeg.

(3) Russia goes and the US sinks a Russian ship, the Russians sink a US aircraft carrier, US nukes a tank column. Russia
backs down.

(4) Same as (3) but Russia keeps going and nukes a US fleet. US backs down

(5) All out nuclear war.

(6) All out nuclear war but we find out that having our weapons labs becoming for profit operations was not the best idea.

On a more serious note, maybe all that will happen is Russia takes over Ukraine, the US and and EU put sanctions on Russia, Russia agrees to leave Ukraine but a very friendly government is put into place.


Anonymous said…
1/27/2022 5:30 PM

"Russia goes in and starts a limited shooting war with the US"

Where? US troops aren't going to be where "Russia goes in." They're going to be in the Balkans and Poland. Get a grip.
Anonymous said…
"Russia goes in and starts a limited shooting war with the US"

Where? US troops aren't going to be where "Russia goes in." They're going to be in the Balkans and Poland. Get a grip.

1/28/2022 5:24 PM

A shooting war could be they shoot down any US war plane going into Ukraine, sink a ship, or engage with any special forces on the ground. Also limited could mean some US troops go into Ukraine. You seem to have lack of understating of how warfare has been fought in the last 100 years or so. I am not sure what the advantage to the US could be be unless Russia backs down.
Anonymous said…
Putin will never "back down." He has absolutely nothing to lose personally, and he cares not at all about the Russian people.
Anonymous said…

If we do not go to war and defeat Russia before 2023 then there is a chance Trump come could come back. Think about it, would you rather risk a nuclear war killing millions or having Trump back as president in 2024? I think the choice is clear.
Anonymous said…
5:24 I think that is your weirdest false dichotomy yet. You are a walking fallacy. Maybe you should participate in a conversation more suited to your skill set, like The View.
Anonymous said…
Seeing Putin and Xi buddying up at the winter games reminds me that they have something in common for the near future, expansion of territory by force, Putin in Ukraine, and Xi in Taiwan. They were probably discussing strategies for taking over these countries. I'm sure that Xi is watching the Ukraine situation closely to see what he can get away with.
Anonymous said…
Seeing Putin and Xi buddying up at the winter games reminds me that they have something in common for the near future, expansion of territory by force, Putin in Ukraine, and Xi in Taiwan. They were probably discussing strategies for taking over these countries. I'm sure that Xi is watching the Ukraine situation closely to see what he can get away with.

2/05/2022 4:57 PM

Agreed the best approach is to go to war with Russia, that is what educated sane and enlightened people would do. Stop listening to Joe Rogan and Alex Jones. If you work at LLNL I expect that went to college and know better.
Anonymous said…
Seeing Putin and Xi buddying up at the winter games reminds me that they have something in common for the near future, expansion of territory by force, Putin in Ukraine, and Xi in Taiwan. They were probably discussing strategies for taking over these countries. I'm sure that Xi is watching the Ukraine situation closely to see what he can get away with.

2/05/2022 4:57 PM

It is about much more than that. Try to keep up with actual global threats to democratic countries. The US administration may be blinded by progressive nonsense but other countries aren't.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!