Skip to main content

LLNS death stats

 I'm reading here that at least 2 LLNS employee deaths (that we know of) may have been prevented with appropriate management employee engagement. My question is, how do these loss of life tragedy stats differ from other USA employers if they do at all? Are LLNS employment related death stats consistent with non-government funded employers?

Comments

Anonymous said…
Here are some limited LLNS stats from this "LLNL True Story" Blog:

In 2009, a NIF employee was placed into EBA status then dies by an onsite government vehicle that he had been operating. The DOE/NNSA Accident Report fails to mention this employees new EBA status or the plausible relevance of the EBA status and the subsequent death of this NIF employee. Instead, the report calls it a "routine transfer to another position". The report also states, "This report neither determines nor implies liability". In 2012, a NIF employee commits suicide after being informed he was in the process of being fired. In 2013, a former NIF employee placed into EBA status wanted to report to a non-NIF manager, but that request was denied by his assigned NIF manager who went on to say, "I'm going to be your manager until the end." NIF doesn't appear to have been a compassionate or caring place for employees to work these many years ago. Has NIF management and NIF employee interactions improved in 2022, or do they have the same shameful employee treatment issues to this day?
Anonymous said…
Was this alleged 2007 forward LLNS management callousness toward LLNS employees any less so under UC/LLNL management prior to the contract change?
Anonymous said…
I haven’t read about a LLNS management callous treatment of LLNS employees or LLNS employee suicides on Glassdoor? So much for that employer reference.
Anonymous said…
The thoughtless display toward LLNS employees started with the “gray march” layoff of 2008, that allowed for more unneeded Bechtel management imports, then surgical acts of callousness continued from 2008 forward as mentioned. Not a track record to be proud of, but rather one to hide.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem

From the Huffington Post Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/25/work-words_n_5159868.html?utm_hp_ref=business&ir=Business When we replace a specific task with a vague expression, we grant the task more magnitude than it deserves. If we don't describe an activity plainly, it seems less like an easily achievable goal and more like a cloudy state of existence that fills unknowable amounts of time. A fog of fast and empty language has seeped into the workplace. I say it's time we air it out, making room for simple, concrete words, and, therefore, more deliberate actions. By striking the following 26 words from your speech, I think you'll find that you're not quite as overwhelmed as you thought you were. Count the number that LLNLs mangers use.  touch base circle back bandwidth - impactful - utilize - table the discussion deep dive - engagement - viral value-add - one-sheet deliverable - work product - incentivise - take it to the ...