Skip to main content

Have LLNL employees benefited from subsidized college education?

 Have LLNL employees benefited from subsidized college education?


For decades, the University of California and California state colleges were free. Some of you may not have known this. I'm sure some of the students of that era were or are working at LLNL. Since ~1980, college tuition has grown faster than inflation. Many years ago, Peter Schiff said the spiraling cost of college in the USA was largely due to easily acquired federal loans, since that allowed colleges to continue to raise their tuitions and fees. Then colleges could raise costs, the federal loans increased, and the cycle repeated. Something to consider before criticizing the $10K student loan forgiveness.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Like, throwing gasoline on the fire?

Watch for greed to rule over intelligent restraint -- tuition will skyrocket, quickly swallowing up the 10k$ - 20k$ of govt subsidized costs. Biden's crass attempt to buy votes will backfire.
Anonymous said…

"Then colleges could raise costs, the federal loans increased, and the cycle repeated. Something to consider before criticizing the $10K student loan forgiveness."

Read that again, read again and read again. You see the problem?

Ok I will bite and guess this was a troll post. This is exactly the problem colleges are simply going to raise tuition by 10k. In fact colleges are the ones pushing for the loan forgiveness because they automatically get the money. Additionally students who had doubts about getting a MS degree due to past debt will now say, I just saved 10k, I can afford to take out another loan and get another degree. More people will not be talking out loans because they also think the odds are good that some additional forgiveness will be coming sometime in the future. In economics this is known as a moral hazard.

By the way I am not against the debt forgiveness I simply want colleges to eat these costs not the taxpayers. Universities have been pushing for years that 70% or or more of the population needs a college degree. The realty is at most 20% of adults need a bs degree. Even that seems high. I can understand talking a loan to go to college to get high paying degree that gives you knowledge you actually need to do your job. Very few jobs need 4 years of college training. More and more people are going to college for the "college experience", drinking, parties, road trips, football, a year abroad, friends, a good time. There is also the issue of increasing automation so that less and less people are going be needed to work, which means even less reason for college.

Lets take the labs LLNL, or LANL, what percentage of the people actually need college degree to do their jobs? Not the security guards, not the clean up, not the bureaucracy, even many of the tech support people do not need a degree, not the maintenance. To be clear they could take specific courses and have apprenticeship training but they do not need 4 year degrees. That is more than 50% of the labs, once you get to most other places are you down to 15 precent or less.



Anonymous said…
"For decades, the University of California and California state colleges were free. "

The first two years still are in the California Junior Colleges(except for books, etc.). That's all that's needed for the majority of technical jobs.
Anonymous said…
Isn't everything dumbed down, so you need to go to college to get the same education that used to be high school?
Anonymous said…
Isn't everything dumbed down, so you need to go to college to get the same education that used to be high school?

8/28/2022 9:58 AM


That sounds about right.
Anonymous said…
Supporting the two 9:58 comments, a few years ago there was a big fuss in New Mexico because high school students with high GPAs still had to take various remedial courses upon college entry. I don't know to what extent that's changed, but the fact remains that NM schools consistently inhabit the lower ends of the good lists and the upper ends of the bad ones. So if it has changed, it's highly likely that college requirements have been dumbed down.

As usual the government, regardless of party, addresses a symptom and not the basic issue: in this case, how to fix the ridiculous cost of college. Back in the day (I'm a doddering 91 year old) a student could work his/her way through college. I had the benefit of the GI bill, but as I had a family to support I still had to work at part-time jobs. The point is that it was doable; students could work their way through college without piling up debt.

We need to get back to that instead of handing out money in hopes of buying votes.
Anonymous said…
8/29/2022 1:43 PM

Yes colleges are now dropping more and more requirements like certain levels of math. More schools are dropping the SAT, ACT and so on, for various reasons, this is true even in the UC system.

College is increasing about the "experience" which is parties, road trips, football games, a year abroad, clubs, groups, that kind of thing. If there is any work it is summer internships which are a joke half the time. Heck even in the sciences and engineering this is happening more and more.

Take heart though I think all it means is we need less and less people in college even though we more than ever in college.
Anonymous said…
"Lets take the labs LLNL, or LANL, what percentage of the people actually need college degree to do their jobs? Not the security guards, not the clean up, not the bureaucracy, even many of the tech support people do not need a degree, not the maintenance."

With LLNS, you can have the credentials to be hired as a security guard, not even "tech support", then seemingly, have the credentials to be the HEAF Facility Manager, when past FMs had either a Masters in Engineering or a PhD. Why go through the rigor of an engineering or scientific degree for career and advancement opportunities, only to work for such an employer? No moral hazard here right? Wrong.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!