Skip to main content

LLNL names deputy director

 Worth a topic of discussion?


https://www.llnl.gov/news/carolyn-zerkle-named-lawrence-livermores-deputy-director

Comments

Anonymous said…

Just saw this.

Carolyn Zerkle is a rather infamous character on the blog site and was subject of endless comments over the years. There are so many good stories about her. In any case she seemed to be a LANS person through and through and through. There seemed to only be bad stories about her on the blog. Since the blog might be filter for only certain views, I am sure there must be plenty of people who will point out good things.
Anonymous said…
I'm glad she is leaving LANL and becoming your problem now. But I'm surprised LLNL selected a career project manager, non-PhD, bureaucrat type as deputy director. Is that typical, or just another sign of how the labs have become jobs programs where the goal is to spend increasing sums on paper pushers, accountants, regulatory compliance and countless other non-core roles?
Anonymous said…
My dealings with Zerkle at LANL were always cordial, but she obviously had a very high opinion of herself.
Anonymous said…
"other non-core roles"

The unspoken question really is, what best juices the LLNS annual award fee, those with the talent to best meet our NNSA milestones, or those that are best at massaging these milestones to the NNSA Field Office for maximum profit? This is where we are. Sorry.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

Rumor corner

LLNS may have excluded the wrong people in last VSSOP? The exclusions were based on outdated job categories and related skills. ULM are now thinking that in the future, job categories and functional areas will have to be re-defined. The next VSSOP/ISP will be based on the new categories and functional areas. The questions I have are: 1) Why didnt they think of that before the transition. It seems like their style is “change things as you go”. Planning is out the window! 2) Who will give input on the new changes? The next RIF apparently is going to be more lucrative than the VSSOP. Depending on the length of employment, a RIFed person, not only gets their 1 week pay per year of service but also from 30 to 120 days notice, essentially 30 to 120 days pay. Please feel free to comment on the rumors or add new ones you actually heard.