Skip to main content

LLNL names deputy director

 Worth a topic of discussion?


https://www.llnl.gov/news/carolyn-zerkle-named-lawrence-livermores-deputy-director

Comments

Anonymous said…

Just saw this.

Carolyn Zerkle is a rather infamous character on the blog site and was subject of endless comments over the years. There are so many good stories about her. In any case she seemed to be a LANS person through and through and through. There seemed to only be bad stories about her on the blog. Since the blog might be filter for only certain views, I am sure there must be plenty of people who will point out good things.
Anonymous said…
I'm glad she is leaving LANL and becoming your problem now. But I'm surprised LLNL selected a career project manager, non-PhD, bureaucrat type as deputy director. Is that typical, or just another sign of how the labs have become jobs programs where the goal is to spend increasing sums on paper pushers, accountants, regulatory compliance and countless other non-core roles?
Anonymous said…
My dealings with Zerkle at LANL were always cordial, but she obviously had a very high opinion of herself.
Anonymous said…
"other non-core roles"

The unspoken question really is, what best juices the LLNS annual award fee, those with the talent to best meet our NNSA milestones, or those that are best at massaging these milestones to the NNSA Field Office for maximum profit? This is where we are. Sorry.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem

From the Huffington Post Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/25/work-words_n_5159868.html?utm_hp_ref=business&ir=Business When we replace a specific task with a vague expression, we grant the task more magnitude than it deserves. If we don't describe an activity plainly, it seems less like an easily achievable goal and more like a cloudy state of existence that fills unknowable amounts of time. A fog of fast and empty language has seeped into the workplace. I say it's time we air it out, making room for simple, concrete words, and, therefore, more deliberate actions. By striking the following 26 words from your speech, I think you'll find that you're not quite as overwhelmed as you thought you were. Count the number that LLNLs mangers use.  touch base circle back bandwidth - impactful - utilize - table the discussion deep dive - engagement - viral value-add - one-sheet deliverable - work product - incentivise - take it to the ...