Skip to main content

Shootings in Los Alamos.

 Two different shooting incidents in Los Alamos and two dead. Expect more of this as the town is changing and will start becoming more like standard town in New Mexico

Comments

Anonymous said…

A standard NM town?

Here are the 10 states with the highest murder rate:

Top 10 States by murder rate.

Mississippi - 20.50 per 100k
Louisiana - 19.90 per 100k
Alabama - 14.20 per 100k
Missouri - 14 per 100k
Arkansas - 13 per 100k
South Carolina - 12.70 per 100k
Tennessee - 11.50 per 100k
Maryland - 11.40 per 100k
Illinois - 11.20 per 100k
New Mexico - 10.80 per 100k
Anonymous said…
The “compare two cities” website might be of value since property crime and violent crime can vary from city to city in any state.
I wouldn’t rely on state crime data alone if I were considering a move anywhere in the USA.


https://www.bestplaces.net/compare-cities/

Anonymous said…
The crime rate in Los Alamos is nonexistent except for petty theft and car burglaries (mostly unlocked cars, teens looking for drug money). A brother shooting his sister in a low-income area is an outlier, especially when the brother already served time for killing his wife. Bad people are everywhere.
Anonymous said…
According to the compare two cities website provided, crime is higher in Livermore, CA than it is in Los Alamos, NM

Violent Crime: Livermore, CA is 14.5, Los Alamos, NM is 11.3, USA is 22.7
Property Crime: Livermore, CA is 33.4, Los Alamos, NM is 16.3, USA is 35.4

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!