The “Prime Contract” DE-AC52-07NA27344 with LLNS, began on October 1, 2007, and is scheduled to end on September 30, 2026 (~3 years from now).
Who are the material contenders to manage LLNL when LLNS is out? What actions have been taken thus far to make the transition to the next federal contractor to manage LLNL, occur with minimum delay due to failure to prepare?
Comments
“Los Alamos contract extended for another year”
from commenter:
“UC ran these labs for decades at a tenth of the overhead cost. Without the conspicuous accidents and loss of talent. Go back to them.”
https://pubs.aip.org/physicstoday/online/9534/Los-Alamos-contract-extended-for-another-year
Yes, former LANS and still surviving LLNS are same same. Time to finish the removal of any smell of LANSLLNS from these NNSA Laboratories for good.
The NNSA wants to attract and retain credentialed and experienced employees that have real career choices beyond the National Labs. To do so, the NNSA could create a TCP1 like pension system, but they won’t. However, it should be self evident to the NNSA by now, that:
1. A for-profit contractor is significantly more expensive than a non-profit contractor
2. A for-profit contractor brings NO value added for their additional expense (history confirms this)
3. In hindsight, many past DOE officials prefer a non-profit project and workforce oriented contractor model
Easy peasy