Friday, September 1, 2023

Pulsed power fusion

 Is it time to put pulsed power fusion to bed? Given the success of NIF and the inability of the Z machine to get anywhere near that level of performance, should the NNSA officially announce that fusion will no longer be pursued on pulsed power machines? I understand there is great difficulty in scaling to a larger Z machine due to power flow losses. The future designs presented by Sandia are also highly impractical, relying on hundreds of thousands of capacitors. I think it’s over for pulsed power fusion efforts

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

“The success of NIF…”. You keep using that phrase. I do not think it means what you think it means.

Meanwhile, pulsed power machines with millions of components are being built. Ever hear of Scorpious?

Anonymous said...

Scorpius is for x-ray radiography. I’m talking about multi-billion $ pulsed power machines for fusion. Different technology, different application.

NIF was successful in achieving ignition. Z has not been successful in that sense,

Anonymous said...

NIF was extremely successful in redefining ignition. One could claim a similar degree of “success” with any of a dozen fusion producing mechanisms.

LLNS Contract discussion

SUGGEST NEW TOPICS HERE

Submit candidates for new topics here only. Stay on topic with National Labs' related issues. All submissions are screened first for ...