Blog purpose

This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA. The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore, The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them. Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted. Blog author serves as a moderator. For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com

Blog rules

  • Stay on topic.
  • No profanity, threatening language, pornography.
  • NO NAME CALLING.
  • No political debate.
  • Posts and comments are posted several times a day.

Friday, September 1, 2023

Pulsed power fusion

 Is it time to put pulsed power fusion to bed? Given the success of NIF and the inability of the Z machine to get anywhere near that level of performance, should the NNSA officially announce that fusion will no longer be pursued on pulsed power machines? I understand there is great difficulty in scaling to a larger Z machine due to power flow losses. The future designs presented by Sandia are also highly impractical, relying on hundreds of thousands of capacitors. I think it’s over for pulsed power fusion efforts

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

“The success of NIF…”. You keep using that phrase. I do not think it means what you think it means.

Meanwhile, pulsed power machines with millions of components are being built. Ever hear of Scorpious?

Anonymous said...

Scorpius is for x-ray radiography. I’m talking about multi-billion $ pulsed power machines for fusion. Different technology, different application.

NIF was successful in achieving ignition. Z has not been successful in that sense,

Anonymous said...

NIF was extremely successful in redefining ignition. One could claim a similar degree of “success” with any of a dozen fusion producing mechanisms.

Posts you viewed tbe most last 30 days