Is it time to put pulsed power fusion to bed? Given the success of NIF and the inability of the Z machine to get anywhere near that level of performance, should the NNSA officially announce that fusion will no longer be pursued on pulsed power machines? I understand there is great difficulty in scaling to a larger Z machine due to power flow losses. The future designs presented by Sandia are also highly impractical, relying on hundreds of thousands of capacitors. I think it’s over for pulsed power fusion efforts
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
LLNS Contract discussion
SUGGEST NEW TOPICS HERE
Submit candidates for new topics here only. Stay on topic with National Labs' related issues. All submissions are screened first for ...
-
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises t...
-
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will have a huge negative effect on the ...
-
From the Huffington Post Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/25/work-words_n_5159868.html?utm_hp_ref...
3 comments:
“The success of NIF…”. You keep using that phrase. I do not think it means what you think it means.
Meanwhile, pulsed power machines with millions of components are being built. Ever hear of Scorpious?
Scorpius is for x-ray radiography. I’m talking about multi-billion $ pulsed power machines for fusion. Different technology, different application.
NIF was successful in achieving ignition. Z has not been successful in that sense,
NIF was extremely successful in redefining ignition. One could claim a similar degree of “success” with any of a dozen fusion producing mechanisms.
Post a Comment