Skip to main content

Building Nuclear Bomb Cores Again

 https://time.com/6296743/los-alamos-lab-plutonium-pits-nuclear-weapons/


In the Lab Oppenheimer Built, the U.S. Is Building Nuclear Bomb Cores Again

The effort to restart America’s nuclear-weapons manufacturing program in response represents the biggest test since the Manhattan Project. A wide range of arms-control experts and nuclear watchdogs, as well as a handful of lawmakers, are frantically sounding the alarms, warning of the existential risks of the course that leaders in both parties have taken. Critics say the U.S. is repeating the mistakes of the Cold War by funneling billions of taxpayer dollars into weapons that will hopefully never be used and haven’t been tested in more than a generation.

The picturesque setting for Oppenheimer’s pursuit of an atomic bomb contributed to the sense of insularity. Outsiders were not welcome. The people who worked and lived at Los Alamos were bound by secrecy and, with few exceptions, unable to leave. To this day, the people on this isolated plateau say they’re “on the hill,” which by default means that everyone else in the world is “off” it.



That last part is kind of funny. "someone tried to escape the hill but was caught" because no one "leaves the hill". The article is just crap. (1) 95% of anyone working at LANL could easily find a job elsewhere, no one is trapped on "the hill". (2) in the last 20 years the lab has had about 50% turnover rate, people get offers all the time. Anyone I know who said they wanted to leave, because of a spouse, new area, or what they are doing at the lab was shrinking got an offer in short order. Less than half the workers at LANL even live on "the hill". Also you could this about anything, people who work in DC say "we work in DC" which by default means everyone else "does not work in DC". Ok that is just stupid.

Comments

Anonymous said…
I think the labs should start thinking how they can be relevant in a possible domestic armed conflict. Things are likely to get ugly soon with 2024 around the corner.

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/national/article280684650.html

Thirty-one percent of Donald Trump supporters and 24% of President Joe Biden supporters said democracy is “no longer viable” and an alternative system should be tried, according to an October poll from the University of Virginia’s Center for Politics

The poll surveyed 2,008 registered voters from Aug. 25 to Sept. 11 and has a margin of error of plus or minus 2.2 percentage points.

Other key findings:

When asked whether it is acceptable to employ violence to stop political opponents from attaining their goals, 41% of Biden supporters and 38% of Trump supporters said yes.

30% of Trump supporters and 25% of Biden supporters said elections should be suspended in times of crisis.

41% of Trump supporters and 30% of Biden supporters said they favor either conservative or liberal states seceding from the union.

Nearly half of Biden supporters, 47%, and 35% of Trump supporters said the government should restrict the expression of views “considered discriminatory or offensive.”
Anonymous said…
Prior to about 17 years ago you were “stuck” on the hill with the UC pension plan, the only way off was to get another job at another UC facility or just walk away from that retirement benefit and take a smaller retirement check later on.

Now you have the benefit of a 401k and you can just find another job off of the hill with that exact same 401K and continue contributing to that retirement plan… you are no longer stuck on that hill. That’s what the new hires right out of college are doing. Get your first job at a lab… looks good on the resume and makes a good stepping stone to the next level.
Anonymous said…
2:19. Absolutely correct. Unfortunately, the weaker candidates stay on on the Labs and hire even weaker candidates to fill their tiny shoes.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!