Skip to main content

Altman and OpenAI

 https://www.reuters.com/technology/sam-altmans-ouster-openai-was-precipitated-by-letter-board-about-ai-breakthrough-2023-11-22/


Nov 22 (Reuters) - Ahead of OpenAI CEO Sam Altman’s four days in exile, several staff researchers wrote a letter to the board of directors warning of a powerful artificial intelligence discovery that they said could threaten humanity, two people familiar with the matter told Reuters.

This sounds like the Einstein-Szilard letter in a way! I believe Karl Marx said history repeats itself, first as tragedy then as a farce.

Comments

Anonymous said…
"the board of directors warning of a powerful artificial intelligence discovery that they said could threaten humanity"

Well then if history repeats itself it will be built for sure.

I am not sure the labs will have much to offer in terms of AI. I think LANL tried some of this in the early 2000s and it was scoffed at as being irrelevant. LANL is now pushing AI as a big LANL focus but I none of the managers that wrote the latest mission statement have any expertise in AI or machine learning. Seems kind of hopeless.
Anonymous said…
Is there any AI research at LLNL?
Anonymous said…
Is there any AI research at LLNL?

11/25/2023 9:10 AM

There is some in LANL mostly some PIs applying known AI/machine learning methods to certain problems with some modest success but no one has developed anything that has any kind high impact, and any of the early AI, machine learning staff left 10-15 years ago. Some more recent people were doing good work on AI and quantum computing but I think they left as well. I think it is going to very hard attract strong people to work on AI at LANL with so many better options, better pay and better places to work. There are a few managers which have been titled as "AI supreme czar", "head leader of AI at LANL", "top big strong big leader AI at LANL" and none one on but these people have never done research on AI. You see lots of proposals with "we will apply AI techniques" but this is on the level of what undergraduates can do with canned programs and such. Evervody knows the buzz and hype but few really understand what it is and what type of problems it can be useful for, how accurate it can be and so one.
Anonymous said…
AI research at LLNL -

Go to the lab's home page for news at https://www.llnl.gov/news
and type in artificial intelligence in the "search for" box.
Anonymous said…
5:35 part of the problem with having a fossilized workforce managed by for-profit bureaucrats is that they aren’t exactly on the cutting edge of science. Even the few pockets of AI research that exist at LANL are basically repeating the same work others performed at Universities a decade or two ago.

Meanwhile AI is being represented in Congressional circles by the likes of Boebert and AOC. Dark days are ahead.
Anonymous said…
"Even the few pockets of AI research that exist at LANL are basically repeating the same work others performed at Universities a decade or two ago"

There was some strong people looking at AI and related work about 15-10 years ago, but they have left. Some still have a few connections at the LANL. Most the AI work at LANL seems to connected with outside university. It seems like a buzz word that managers are throwing out now because everybody is using it. We are kind of late to the the party on this kind of work.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!