Skip to main content

Layoffs?

 Any regular readers in HR or management got a timeline on coming layoffs?

Comments

Anonymous said…
447 open positions at LANL
148 open positions at LLNL
129 open positions at Sandia
Anonymous said…
I’m not in LLNS HR, but please share your timeline forecast of a looming layoff, its size, and based on what budget shortfall? I’m retired, but if a LLNS layoff is on the way, and there wasn’t an announced VSIP in the works, LLNS obviously doesn’t want to give employees any heads up. They more or less have their layoff lists on the shelf.
Anonymous said…
I am not in HR but heard a rambling Bechtelian at LLNL when asked about layoffs. Last in, first out was my takeaway from the rambling.
Anonymous said…
Don’t count on it. “Last in first out” didn’t happen in 2012. Not even close.
Anonymous said…
They gotta let the latest round of duds stew a bit before laying them off.
Anonymous said…
At LLNL, the supplemental labor workforce, policy and historically identified as your LLNS “career indefinite” FTE lay off buffer, will mostly keep their jobs under LLNS management. Why? Because supplemental labor is generally less expensive to a program than FTEs, even though supplemental labor usually have higher salaries to that of comparable FTE positions. I bet your LLNS recruiter and hiring manager didn’t tell you that during your lab interview.
Anonymous said…
3/25/2024 7:49 AM

I hear there is a hiring freeze in Sandia. They can still hire someone but you have to have an urgent need LANL will have short fall next year of 100 million. Not a big deal in terms of budget scale but the LANL hired tons of people and pit production is now the priority. There are rumblings that we still need to ramp off hires for pits which implies a hiring freeze for the rest of lab. I am not sure about layoffs. There are rumors that NNSA is simply not very happy with LANL and even Sandia at this point. I heard nothing about LLNL but was they say when LANL sneezes gets a cold
Anonymous said…
Looks like things have changed drastically since some people retired.

Anonymous said…
“Looks like things have changed drastically since some people retired.“

“Changed drastically”? How so? Better or worse? Your current thoughts on the matter will be appreciated.
Anonymous said…
In 2024, LLNS employees are still scared shi_less to open up about life under LLNS management, most unfortunate, but understandable. Time for a new non-profit LLC to move in without delay, and certainly minus Bechtel and enablers of Bechtel.
Anonymous said…
Is LLNL under LLNS management, a bad place to work? And why are these workplace concerns years after the 2007 LLNL management change, unaddressed? Are the liberal arts majors at the Livermore Field Office that out of touch, or are they part of the problem? I guess the NNSA didn’t learn anything from the LANS failure. Wow.
Anonymous said…
lol. All rumors are hiring 6000 for pits.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!