Skip to main content

The second whistleblower linked to Boeing dies

 Boeing-Linked Whistleblower Dead, the Second in 2 Months: ‘He Possessed Tremendous Courage,’ Lawyers Say


https://people.com/boeing-linked-whistleblower-dead-the-second-in-2-months-8642445

Comments

Anonymous said…
This could be just a random occurrence : there are a lot of Boeing whistleblowers that have come forward, of course, and many of them are older.
Anonymous said…
“This could be just a random occurrence…”

“Boeing whistleblower says he was told ‘frankly, to shut up’ after 3 years of raising aircraft quality concerns: ‘This is the hell that I was subjected to’”

“Instead of addressing his concerns, he said, Boeing brass shut him down, part of a broader trend within the company of brushing off safety concerns in the name of productivity and the bottom line.”

Powerful and influential for-profit companies, 100% support their whistleblower employees right? Who would want to be actively complicit with any other treatment of a whistleblower?

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/boeing-whistleblower-says-told-frankly-214347933.html
Anonymous said…
“Who would want to be actively complicit with any other treatment of a whistleblower?”

Most employees would obviously not want to be identified as “actively complicit”. And, if too many employees became aware of unlawful or retaliatory treatment, the odds of one of them squealing or making a revealing mistake will increase.

A more likely path of being treated like “hell”, is to keep the intent and goal of such treatment limited to a few key individuals, and then systematically leverage other employees not acutely “in the know”, with workplace tasks that indirectly support the abusive treatment, until the desired end goal is achieved. Ugly, but it does occur and it can lead to high levels of stress, hardship, or worse for the subject of such abuse, whatever age that person is. We can do better.
Anonymous said…
I'm not totally convinced that Airbus planes are currently any safer to fly on, and I feel safe on either in general -- it could be that Boeing had a series of problems, but there were other times in the past where the same was true of Airbus. There are other factors besides the aircraft in a lot of incidents, maintenance, crew training and skill, flying conditions, air traffic control and airport conditions, and the controls and design philosophy is a bit different.

In the United States in particular there have been not that many fatalities on either Boeing or Airbus flights in the last 20 years -- perhaps because a lot of these other factors are dealt with well thanks to FAA and other agency regulations and safety work:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fatal_accidents_and_incidents_involving_commercial_aircraft_in_the_United_States

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!