Skip to main content

More on EPA whistleblower

Image
By scooby

 This is an article about the East Palestine whistle-blower case against the EPA:


http://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory/whistleblower-questions-delays-mistakes-epa-sensor-plane-after-110219868

https://abcnews.go.com/US/whistleblower-claims-epa-wasted-critical-time-after-devastating/story?id=110313045

He was evidently one of the key people working on it, and was associated with Los Alamos:

https://www.osti.gov/biblio/987102

Some of the details are in this affidavit:

https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/24662298/kroutil_signed_statement1_may12_2023.pdf


Comments

Anonymous said…
By the way it seems the East Palestine disaster has been politicized, with Republicans blaming all the problems on Democrats and government bureaucracy or so-called "deep state".

In actuality Republican policies have involved deregulation, and tax cuts to starve the Federal government of money, policies against labor unions and so forth.
5/18/2024 9:34 AM
Anonymous said…
If one wishes to believe that the cause of the East Palestine accident is based on Republican policies, then so be it.

That does not explain why the EPA, now under a Democratic leadership, would delay the gathering of scientific data and then inhibit what data was to be gathered. We hear the adage of "follow the science" from the left, perhaps in this case one should "follow the money."
5/19/2024 2:47 PM
Anonymous said…
2:47 -- I was not making the claim that only Republicans were responsible. It would be more correct to blame members of both political parties in Washington.

Also, in a legal sense, I think Norfolk Southern was found to be responsible for the accident by a court in Ohio and as a good corporate citizen they have done a lot to remediate the problem and compensate victims. The Federal government also has done a lot.

There have been various claims that the accident produced dioxins or other dioxin like compounds, which contain chlorine and might be persistent in the environment. This is no doubt true to some extent, in fact the combustion of vinyl chloride monomer can create a variety of organic chemicals from incomplete combustion as well as soot.

There was in fact evidently another whistleblower case I haven't followed that claimed the EPA was not forthcoming with some tests related to dioxins and this type of contamination.

Obviously some of this could occur naturally in the environment, and I have read of other cases (in Canada I think) where many years ago a civilian version of Agent Orange was sprayed by railroads to control vegetation near railroad tracks.

The toxicology of those compounds is a complicated topic, but they are known to affect animals much more than humans so some of the claims of extreme toxicity may be questionable.

There was an accident in Sevaso Italy which released a very large quantity of dioxins into the environment, for example, certain cancers were observed at higher numbers but the incidence of all cancers combined (where better statistics were available) was not elevated:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seveso_disaster

https://ehjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1476-069X-8-39
5/20/2024 9:15 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

By scooby
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
155 comments
Read more

Trump is to gut the labs.

By scooby
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.
124 comments
Read more

Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem

By scooby
From the Huffington Post Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/25/work-words_n_5159868.html?utm_hp_ref=business&ir=Business When we replace a specific task with a vague expression, we grant the task more magnitude than it deserves. If we don't describe an activity plainly, it seems less like an easily achievable goal and more like a cloudy state of existence that fills unknowable amounts of time. A fog of fast and empty language has seeped into the workplace. I say it's time we air it out, making room for simple, concrete words, and, therefore, more deliberate actions. By striking the following 26 words from your speech, I think you'll find that you're not quite as overwhelmed as you thought you were. Count the number that LLNLs mangers use.  touch base circle back bandwidth - impactful - utilize - table the discussion deep dive - engagement - viral value-add - one-sheet deliverable - work product - incentivise - take it to the ...
96 comments
Read more