Skip to main content

DEI rollback: who's next?

 Trump rolls back DEI across the federal government. Is your workplace next?


https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2025/01/20/trump-dei-rollback-executive-order/77749870007

Comments

Anonymous said…
White House OPM orders all DEI offices to begin closing by end of day Wednesday

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/white-house-opm-orders-all-dei-offices-begin-closing-end-day-wednesday
Anonymous said…
DEI brought us Sam Brinton, and numerous Federally funded employees across the DOE Complex, that would not otherwise been hired, promoted, or shielded from their improper workplace and or non-workplace conduct.
Anonymous said…
This is a good article that goes into detail, evidently there is a claim that DEI is discriminatory and illegal, and will be ended even in the private sector

https://www.forbes.com/sites/saradorn/2025/01/23/trumps-diversity-orders-rattle-ceos-what-companies-should-know-about-new-dei-rules/

Anonymous said…
What will happen to the LLNS “Director of Strategic Diversity and Inclusion Programs” position, and all the related DEI positions at LLNL? Will these employees be placed on administrative leave, and will LLNS ensure “efforts
to disguise these programs by using coded or imprecise language” do not and have not occurred?
Anonymous said…
ATF accused of 'circumventing' Trump order to place DEI staff on paid leave

“Boykin was listed as the chief diversity officer as recently as Tuesday – Trump’s second day in the Oval Office – and now shows her as working as the agency's "senior executive." “

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/atf-accused-circumventing-trump-order-place-dei-staff-paid-leave
Anonymous said…
Will the lab rename the DEI positions in an attempt to hide them following the lead set by the ATF?
Anonymous said…
If someone wants to investigate something at LLNS I would look into how OT is handed out and awards or bonuses.
Anonymous said…
“Will the lab rename the DEI positions…”

In addition to obvious DEI job titles, it should be easy enough for DOE/NNSA to look for key DEI words in recent lab performance appraisals to see who was officially identified as having a DEI programmatically funded function in full or in part, over the last few years. There are also charge accounts associated with DEI tasks. If the lab DEI sanitized or scrubbed performance appraisals, that would fall under trying to obscure or rename. Will DEI managers and employees be placed into EIT status?
Anonymous said…
While it should be easy to look for DEI fingerprints, will DOE/NNSA be motivated to do so without someone from above waving a wooden spoon?
Anonymous said…
When a DEI hire gets so intrenched in a Lab DEI recognized position, the DEI division leaders and other enablers go out of their way to protect that employee
at all costs, including security clearance violations
that never reach the LSO or HQ for proper investigation, thinking this is best for their own career interest, well, maybe that was the wrong approach. Time for a security clearance review of all DEI enablers. Absolute protection of DEI hired lab employees should have consequences.
Anonymous said…
It’s hard to think or act objectively when you are appointed, completely bypassing interview peer review, to a division leader position, right Joe?

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!