I just received my annual TCP-1 letter from LLNS and a summary of the LLNS Pension Plan. Looked in pretty good shape in 2013. About 35% overfunded (funding target attainment percentage = 134.92%). This was a decrease from 2012 where it was 51% overfunded (funding target attainment percentage = 151.59%). They did note that the 2012 change in the law on how liabilities are calculated using interest rates improved the plan's position. Without the change the funding target attainment percentages would have been 118% (2012) and 105% (2013). 2013 assets = $2,057,866,902 2013 liabilities = $1,525,162,784 vs 2012 assets = $1,844,924,947 2012 liabilities = $1,217,043,150 It was also noted that a slightly different calculation method ("fair market value") designed to show a clearer picture of the plan' status as December 31, 2013 had; Assets = $2,403,098,433 Liabilities = $2,068,984,256 Funding ratio = 116.15% Its a closed plan with 3,781 participants. Of that number, 3,151 wer...
Comments
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/white-house-opm-orders-all-dei-offices-begin-closing-end-day-wednesday
https://www.forbes.com/sites/saradorn/2025/01/23/trumps-diversity-orders-rattle-ceos-what-companies-should-know-about-new-dei-rules/
to disguise these programs by using coded or imprecise language” do not and have not occurred?
“Boykin was listed as the chief diversity officer as recently as Tuesday – Trump’s second day in the Oval Office – and now shows her as working as the agency's "senior executive." “
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/atf-accused-circumventing-trump-order-place-dei-staff-paid-leave
In addition to obvious DEI job titles, it should be easy enough for DOE/NNSA to look for key DEI words in recent lab performance appraisals to see who was officially identified as having a DEI programmatically funded function in full or in part, over the last few years. There are also charge accounts associated with DEI tasks. If the lab DEI sanitized or scrubbed performance appraisals, that would fall under trying to obscure or rename. Will DEI managers and employees be placed into EIT status?
at all costs, including security clearance violations
that never reach the LSO or HQ for proper investigation, thinking this is best for their own career interest, well, maybe that was the wrong approach. Time for a security clearance review of all DEI enablers. Absolute protection of DEI hired lab employees should have consequences.