Skip to main content

Lab broken culture

 Does any of this sound familiar? I am not sure about LLNL but much of this applies to LANL. Maybe not all 12 but about 9 or 10 of these are true right now.


If employees are afraid to speak up, your culture is broken.

Here’s what silence really means:
➟ Leaders aren’t listening.
➟ Feedback is punished.
➟ Trust is nonexistent.

And here’s what happens next:
➟ Your best people leave.
➟ Creativity dies.
➟ Morale tanks.


12 Signs Your Culture is Broken:

— All the good people are leaving
— No one is sharing feedback
— People are pointing fingers
— Communication is weak
— Mistakes are punished
— Ideas get shot down
— Leaders don’t listen
— Creativity is stifled
— Gossip is rampant
— Trust is missing
— Stress is high
— Morale is low

Comments

Anonymous said…
“12 Signs Your Culture is Broken”

Your signs of a broken culture are accurate, but are not directly applicable to a for-profit DOE contractor who are themselves steps removed, from real time free-market forces that would otherwise compel a company to change course.
Anonymous said…
100% at LANL. Sadly this poor management has been entrenched since Nanos.
Anonymous said…
Sounds exactly like LLNL… darn it sounds like LANL isn’t any better. As an hourly subhuman worker I have never been treated such poorly in my whole career as in the past 3-4 years. Always expected to work through my breaks. Nothing like being in a group of employees and everyone your coworkers gets a silver or gold cash award and you are the only one left out. Don’t get me started on the whole goals bs and how it affects our raises.
Anonymous said…
What's the source for this? It looks on target and accurate (Sandia is described well by the content).
Anonymous said…
Leaders aren’t listening.
➟ Feedback is punished.
" Trust is nonexistent."

There is very little trust at LANL

"And here’s what happens next:
➟ Your best people leave."

This has been happing since 2005 so so. LANL is not longer even close to the same lab it use to be. Bill P, a lab fellow even did a study showing the scientistic decline of LANL but his data also shows the same trend at LLNL and Sandia, while the other DOE labs are all increasing.


"➟ Creativity dies."
That is long dead

"➟ Morale tanks."

Mainly of the senior or mid career people. I think the new workers are not so demoralized and see this is just another job that they will be at for a few years before they move on. They do not really care about the projects, the mission. These is just nice 30 hour week job until something better comes along. Sorry but this is the truth.
Anonymous said…
Smart people realize the “mission” is just a game.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

tcp1 looking good

I just received my annual TCP-1 letter from LLNS and a summary of the LLNS Pension Plan. Looked in pretty good shape in 2013. About 35% overfunded (funding target attainment percentage = 134.92%). This was a decrease from 2012 where it was 51% overfunded (funding target attainment percentage = 151.59%). They did note that the 2012 change in the law on how liabilities are calculated using interest rates improved the plan's position. Without the change the funding target attainment percentages would have been 118% (2012) and 105% (2013). 2013 assets = $2,057,866,902 2013 liabilities = $1,525,162,784 vs 2012 assets = $1,844,924,947 2012 liabilities = $1,217,043,150 It was also noted that a slightly different calculation method ("fair market value") designed to show a clearer picture of the plan' status as December 31, 2013 had; Assets = $2,403,098,433 Liabilities = $2,068,984,256 Funding ratio = 116.15% Its a closed plan with 3,781 participants. Of that number, 3,151 wer...