Skip to main content

More on fusion

 Anonymous contribution :

(NIF Based) “Nuclear Startup Inertia Raises $450M Series A”


https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Mj9KKzdklrE&pp=ygUZYmxvb21iZXJnIHN0YXJ0dXAgaW5lcnRpYQ%3D%3D


(NIF Based) “Laser Fusion Startup Inertia Raises Additional $450M”


https://www.photonics.com/Articles/Laser-Fusion-Startup-Inertia-Raises-Additional/a71954

Comments

Anonymous said…
What the heck?

You can make money by hype by something that works, or by fraud.

I leave it to reader to watch the video and decide if they want to make money or not off this.

Hey if you had to sell your bitcoin in the last two weeks, you might as well invest in something that make some money.

So can they make a laser 1000 times bigger than NIF? I am not sure but maybe the will hire a bunch of former NIF employees to make it work. Just by cutting out Bechtel and the government I would guess you get you automatically bet 10-100 increase. A 10^3 well that could be stretch... but who would you you pick, will NIF or some private company provide fusion energy to the bay area first?

After the quantum computing hype, AI hype...I suppose fusion hype is just as legit as far as bs hype goes. I no longer care if this works as long as I can make profit off this. So yes, use fusion lasers to make free energy for AI centers that run quantum computers that can hack into your AI generated pod.. sounds like money go me.

Ok, lets be serious

500 million sounds like a lot but at LLNL/LANL the overhead rates that would mean about 140million for actual research. Maybe with private company that would 350 million so maybe you could make dent in actual results.

Hmmm...let me look at what can be moved in my portfolio.

Anonymous said…
Anyone dumb enough to buy into that line of baloney deserves what they get.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

tcp1 looking good

I just received my annual TCP-1 letter from LLNS and a summary of the LLNS Pension Plan. Looked in pretty good shape in 2013. About 35% overfunded (funding target attainment percentage = 134.92%). This was a decrease from 2012 where it was 51% overfunded (funding target attainment percentage = 151.59%). They did note that the 2012 change in the law on how liabilities are calculated using interest rates improved the plan's position. Without the change the funding target attainment percentages would have been 118% (2012) and 105% (2013). 2013 assets = $2,057,866,902 2013 liabilities = $1,525,162,784 vs 2012 assets = $1,844,924,947 2012 liabilities = $1,217,043,150 It was also noted that a slightly different calculation method ("fair market value") designed to show a clearer picture of the plan' status as December 31, 2013 had; Assets = $2,403,098,433 Liabilities = $2,068,984,256 Funding ratio = 116.15% Its a closed plan with 3,781 participants. Of that number, 3,151 wer...