Skip to main content

More on fusion

 Anonymous contribution :

(NIF Based) “Nuclear Startup Inertia Raises $450M Series A”


https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Mj9KKzdklrE&pp=ygUZYmxvb21iZXJnIHN0YXJ0dXAgaW5lcnRpYQ%3D%3D


(NIF Based) “Laser Fusion Startup Inertia Raises Additional $450M”


https://www.photonics.com/Articles/Laser-Fusion-Startup-Inertia-Raises-Additional/a71954

Comments

Anonymous said…
What the heck?

You can make money by hype by something that works, or by fraud.

I leave it to reader to watch the video and decide if they want to make money or not off this.

Hey if you had to sell your bitcoin in the last two weeks, you might as well invest in something that make some money.

So can they make a laser 1000 times bigger than NIF? I am not sure but maybe the will hire a bunch of former NIF employees to make it work. Just by cutting out Bechtel and the government I would guess you get you automatically bet 10-100 increase. A 10^3 well that could be stretch... but who would you you pick, will NIF or some private company provide fusion energy to the bay area first?

After the quantum computing hype, AI hype...I suppose fusion hype is just as legit as far as bs hype goes. I no longer care if this works as long as I can make profit off this. So yes, use fusion lasers to make free energy for AI centers that run quantum computers that can hack into your AI generated pod.. sounds like money go me.

Ok, lets be serious

500 million sounds like a lot but at LLNL/LANL the overhead rates that would mean about 140million for actual research. Maybe with private company that would 350 million so maybe you could make dent in actual results.

Hmmm...let me look at what can be moved in my portfolio.

Anonymous said…
Anyone dumb enough to buy into that line of baloney deserves what they get.
Anonymous said…
If NIF was deemed blueprint power plant ready, why isn’t DOE funding a NIF based prototype power plant like a LIFE 2.0?
Anonymous said…
Because NIF is not blueprint ready. ITER will use all the available tritium, none for NIF. There are no high power lasers with the required rep rate and efficiency. Cleanup and repair after a shot takes much too long. Tritium breeding rate is too low. Cross sections, handling and diffusion loss, decay. Targets are not made fast enough. The ice layer must be formed and have few defects. The target must be shot within a few days of capsule loading due to tritium decay, otherwise start over. And others. Research the literature, it is all there.
Anonymous said…
“…Research the literature, it is all there.”

Thanks, so private funds supporting this “start up”are based on what? From your post, not much. A Solyndra 2.0 but with private funds?
Anonymous said…
The private funds supporting fusion are just reacting to the hype machine. The hype machine is messing up many parts of our society. In science we have fusion for power production, string theory, quantum computing, AI, cold fusion, antivaccine, room temperature superconductivity, and on and on. To get the true picture look beyond hype. It can take some effort. By the way already there has been changes in direction and even termination of some efforts. One effort I am watching has switched to HE to compress a plasma for pulsed power production. What shape is the device in after the HE goes off? You are trying to pulse the device.

Anonymous said…
I should mention an effort that is apparently terminated. The Lockheed Skunk Works built some mirror machines but missed deadlines. I have not seen an official announcement, but the word out there is that it is over. The claim was that it would fit on a truck and the mirror machine was pictured as such. But all the support systems were not on the truck.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

Rumor corner

LLNS may have excluded the wrong people in last VSSOP? The exclusions were based on outdated job categories and related skills. ULM are now thinking that in the future, job categories and functional areas will have to be re-defined. The next VSSOP/ISP will be based on the new categories and functional areas. The questions I have are: 1) Why didnt they think of that before the transition. It seems like their style is “change things as you go”. Planning is out the window! 2) Who will give input on the new changes? The next RIF apparently is going to be more lucrative than the VSSOP. Depending on the length of employment, a RIFed person, not only gets their 1 week pay per year of service but also from 30 to 120 days notice, essentially 30 to 120 days pay. Please feel free to comment on the rumors or add new ones you actually heard.