Skip to main content

Discrimination at Sandia

 Sandia accused of racism. Lawsuit filed:


https://www.abqjournal.com/2455361/asian-american-scientist-accuses-sandia-operators-of-discrimination-e.html

Comments

Anonymous said…

Sounds odd. So the person was placed on a performance improvement plan? Why was he placed on this?
Anonymous said…
While it could be racism given that Sandia is a "safe space" for racists, but it's more likely to be retribution for him not playing ball with the new management's terrible approach to running the Lab. Sandia was already second-rate before Honeywell, but after they took over, they fully embraced mediocrity in every respect.

Exceptional mediocrity in funding is the mantra. Just do whatever you can to keep the money flowing. The quality of the work is totally optional and often counter-productive. No one is really looking at the quality of the work anyway. Besides, the external and internal reviews can usually just be BS'ed. Anyone. who doesn't get the religion will be punished.
Anonymous said…
6:14 offers an excellent summary of just exactly what the Nation’s National Labs have become. Racism is the least of our worries. The total lack of scientific integrity is shocking, and no “ethics training” will root out the managers who profit from it.
Anonymous said…
"While it could be racism given that Sandia is a "safe space" for racists, but it's more likely to be retribution for him not playing ball with the new management's terrible approach to running the Lab."

You could be correct. There is near zero incentive for Sandia or other NNSA contractors to work with employees in good faith if they dare speak up on any matter that is not flattering to the contractor. Why? Because the contractor is generally permitted to request and receive 100% NNSA reimbursement for all legal fees and expenses for outside counsel to defend itself, and the contractor can use at will, internal project/task account numbers for hundreds of man-hours worth of charges to develop defense strategies and testimonies that draw funds from its own NNSA awarded operational budget (contract funds). At the same time, contractor profits or award fees remain safe and secure. There have been many high profile lawsuits against NNSA labs that have followed this well polished NNSA funded process. Unless Congress steps in to make material changes to this scenario, expect more of the same.
Anonymous said…
Unless Congress steps in to make material changes to this scenario, expect more of the same.

12/31/2021 7:38 AM

Your scenario is basically the taxpayer being ripped off by high-rolling contributors to Congressmen and Senators (AKA "NNSA contractors"), so don't expect Congress to step in very soon.
Anonymous said…
"Your scenario is basically the taxpayer being ripped off by high-rolling contributors to Congressmen and Senators (AKA "NNSA contractors"), so don't expect Congress to step in very soon."

Correct. Unless the "revolving door" between NNSA managers, congressman pay offs $, and NNSA contractor leadership "changing of hats", you'll get more of the same, until a major accident occurs. A favorable template of operational practices that will surely lead to accidents for the tax payer down winders.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!